83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4690208)
1. Abortion surveillance program of the center for disease control.
Smith JC; Bourne JP
Health Serv Rep; 1973 Mar; 88(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 4690208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The complexity of compiling abortion statistics.
Smith JC
Public Health Rep; 1975; 90(6):502-3. PubMed ID: 813260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Surveillance of abortion program in New York City.
Pakter J; Harris D; Nelson F
Bull N Y Acad Med; 1971 Aug; 47(8):853-74. PubMed ID: 5284223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Strategy for influencing pro-life legislation.
Stratton RW
Hosp Prog; 1974 Feb; 55(2):60-2 passim. PubMed ID: 4811518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Surveillance of abortions in hospitals in the United States, 1970.
Kahn JB; Bourne JP; Asher JD; Tyler CW
HSMHA Health Rep; 1971 May; 86(5):423-30. PubMed ID: 5089307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Teenage abortion and pregnancy statistics by state, 1996.
Henshaw SK; Feivelson DJ
Fam Plann Perspect; 2000; 32(6):272-80. PubMed ID: 11138863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The abortion ruling: analysis & prognosis.
Hosp Prog; 1973 Mar; 54(3):81-3 passim. PubMed ID: 4695460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Legal abortion in Georgia, 1980.
Spitz AM; Oberle M; Zaro SM
J Med Assoc Ga; 1984 Feb; 73(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 6707546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion: the rearguard in birth control.
Kummer JM
J Reprod Med; 1970 Oct; 5(4):167-74. PubMed ID: 5521939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A clearing house for abortion appointments.
Daily EF
Fam Plann Perspect; 1971 Jul; 3(3):12-4. PubMed ID: 5122271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Veto -- or threat thereof -- prevails over majority as 102nd Congress adjourns.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Oct; (15):2-4. PubMed ID: 12317790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Therapeutic abortion in Maryland, 1968-1970.
Melton RJ; Seegar JK; Pitts JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1972 Jun; 39(6):923-30. PubMed ID: 5049910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pregnancy detection: a critical service link.
Oettinger KB
Fam Plann Perspect; 1971 Oct; 3(4):15-8. PubMed ID: 5140231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Septic abortion: a review of social and demographic characteristics.
Osazuwa H; Aziken M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Feb; 275(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 16947056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Induced abortion in the United States, 1971.
Hall RE
J Reprod Med; 1972 Jun; 8(6):345-7. PubMed ID: 5038896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Demographic characteristics of women applying for interruption of pregnancy in Israel, 1989.
Israel. Central Bureau of Statistics
Mon Bull Stat U N Stat Off; 1991 Nov; 42(11 Suppl):77-102. PubMed ID: 12222388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New law will reduce teen pregnancy, family planners predict.
Contracept Technol Update; 1986 Mar; 7(3):25-8. PubMed ID: 12341225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Report of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research: Commission recommendations.
Hastings Cent Rep; 1975 Jun; 5(3):45-6. PubMed ID: 1150421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fatal hemorrhage from legal abortion in the United States.
Grimes DA; Kafrissen ME; O'Reilly KR; Binkin NJ
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1983 Nov; 157(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 6314567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The implications of OSHA for hospitals.
Rodgers R
Hosp Prog; 1973 Jun; 54(6):65-8. PubMed ID: 4706532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
