These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 469398)

  • 21. Comparison of percepts found with cochlear implant devices.
    Müller CG
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():412-20. PubMed ID: 6575663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Impedance changes in cochlear implant users].
    Zadrozniak M; Szymański M; Siwiec H; Broda T
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2011; 65(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 21916223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pitch estimation by early-deafened subjects using a multiple-electrode cochlear implant.
    Busby PA; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan; 107(1):547-58. PubMed ID: 10641663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The results of electrical stimulation of the cochlea in human sensory deafness.
    Michelson RP
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1971 Dec; 80(6):914-9. PubMed ID: 5127759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reimplantation of a molded scala tympani electrode: impact on psychophysical and speech discrimination abilities.
    Hochmair-Desoyer I; Burian K
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1985; 94(1 Pt 1):65-70. PubMed ID: 3838227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Cochlear Implant Performance Prognostic Test Based on Electrical Field Interactions Evaluated by eABR (Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses).
    Guevara N; Hoen M; Truy E; Gallego S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155008. PubMed ID: 27149268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fundamental considerations in designing auditory implants.
    Kiang NY; Eddington DK; Delgutte B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1979; 87(3-4):204-18. PubMed ID: 443001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Protocol for determining the auditory percepts of electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
    Michelson RP; Schubert E; Walsh S; White M
    Laryngoscope; 1979 May; 89(5 Pt 1):748-51. PubMed ID: 449518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of stimulation mode on threshold and loudness growth in multielectrode cochlear implants.
    Chatterjee M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Feb; 105(2 Pt 1):850-60. PubMed ID: 9972570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y; Kaplan-Neeman R; Kronenberg J; Migirov L; Hildesheimer M; Muchnik C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A multiple-electrode array for a cochlear implant.
    Clark GM; Hallworth RJ
    J Laryngol Otol; 1976 Jul; 90(7):623-7. PubMed ID: 956705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Present audiologic status of subjects implanted with auditory prostheses.
    Hopkinson NT; Bilger RC; Black FO
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 3 Suppl 38):40-8. PubMed ID: 405909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Advances in the study of virtual channels of cochlear implant].
    Zhu Z; Guan T; Ye D
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 26(6):1384-7. PubMed ID: 20095509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of Multipole Stimulus Configurations With Respect to Loudness and Spread of Excitation.
    Vellinga D; Briaire JJ; van Meenen DMP; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):487-496. PubMed ID: 28301391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Delayed perception of cochlear implant stimulation in children with postmeningitic ossified cochleae.
    Geier L; Gilden J; Luetje CM; Maddox HE
    Am J Otol; 1993 Nov; 14(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 8296858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Music to electric ears: pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients.
    Pressnitzer D; Bestel J; Fraysse B
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Dec; 1060():343-5. PubMed ID: 16597784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ineraid cochlear implant in the ossified cochlea: surgical techniques and results.
    Montandon PB; Boëx C; Pelizzone M
    Am J Otol; 1994 Nov; 15(6):748-51. PubMed ID: 8572086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.
    Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):478-92. PubMed ID: 11784764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. New parallel stimulation strategies revisited: effect of synchronous multi electrode stimulation on rate discrimination in cochlear implant users.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 22733121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
    McDermott HJ; McKay CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jul; 96(1):155-62. PubMed ID: 8064018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.