These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4697158)

  • 1. Adaptation-level and theory of signal detection: an examination and integration of two judgment models for voluntary stimulus generalization.
    Hébert JA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1973 Mar; 37(1):15-29. PubMed ID: 4697158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Context and frequency effects in the generalization of a human voluntary response.
    Hébert JA; Bullock M; Levitt L; Woodward KG; McGuirk FD
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 Mar; 102(3):456-62. PubMed ID: 4815192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the role of context effects in psychophysical judgment.
    Anderson NH
    Psychol Rev; 1975 Nov; 82(6):462-82. PubMed ID: 1187911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anchor effects in category judgment of weight.
    Vuorinen R
    Scand J Psychol; 1973; 14(4):261-72. PubMed ID: 4772788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adaptation-level theory and context effects on sensory judgments: perception for response?
    Ellis HD
    Perception; 1972; 1(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 4680921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generalization as a function of the range of test stimuli: the roles of discriminability and response bias.
    Croll WL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1972 Apr; 13(2):404-12. PubMed ID: 5028287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Signal detection theory procedures are not equivalent when thermal stimuli are judged.
    Clark WC; Mehl L
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Feb; 97(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 4705234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Two-stimulus--two choice paradigm for psychophysics: range-frequency model and adaptation level theory in comparison].
    Sander K; Sarris V
    Z Exp Psychol; 1997; 44(3):431-46. PubMed ID: 9522678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus presentation frequency in brightness discrimination and generalization: a test of adaptation-level and signal-detection interpretations.
    Thomas DR; Windell BT; Williams JL; White KG
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Mar; 37(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 4022755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating the parameters of multidimensional signal detection theory from simultaneous ratings on separate stimulus components.
    Ashby FG
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Sep; 44(3):195-204. PubMed ID: 3050870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conjoint scaling of subjective number and weight.
    Rule SJ; Curtis DW
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Mar; 97(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 4705240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multidimensional stimulus control: effects of training and-or testing.
    Newman FL; Andreone CF; Washburn L; Purtle RB
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 May; 93(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 5025734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of expectation on judgments of odor.
    Engen T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1972 Dec; 36(6):450-8. PubMed ID: 4679755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanisms of generalization in perceptual learning.
    Liu Z; Weinshall D
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 10768045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Information integration and the identification of stimulus noise and criterial noise in absolute judgment.
    Nosofsky RM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Apr; 9(2):299-309. PubMed ID: 6221074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the development of stimulus control.
    Heinemann EG; Avin E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Sep; 20(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 4752088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in visual spatial organization: response frequency equalization versus adaptation level.
    Steinberg W; Sekuler R
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 May; 98(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 4705626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test of integration theory and adaptation level theory in anchored judgments.
    Steger JA; Wilkinson J; Carter R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Feb; 36(1):271-4. PubMed ID: 4686721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Criterial range as a frame of reference for stimulus judgment.
    Gravetter F; Lockhead GR
    Psychol Rev; 1973 May; 80(3):203-16. PubMed ID: 4714675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tests of the psychological meaning of the power law.
    Duda PD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 May; 104(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 1194869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.