These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4698918)

  • 1. Chromium-amino acid conjugates as elicitors in chromium-sensitized guinea pigs.
    Shmunes E; Katz SA; Samitz MH
    J Invest Dermatol; 1973 Apr; 60(4):193-6. PubMed ID: 4698918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Experimental chromium allergy of animals. The influence of valences and chemical properties of chromium ions (author's transl)].
    Schneeberger HW; Forck G
    Arch Dermatol Forsch; 1974; 249(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 4823431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Tolerance of matches in patients sensitized to chromium].
    Rudzki E; Kozłowska A
    Przegl Dermatol; 1980; 67(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 7375652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cutaneous reactions to chromium.
    Food Cosmet Toxicol; 1973 Jun; 11(3):506-9. PubMed ID: 4580541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Studies on contact hypersensitivity to chromium in the guinea pig. Inhibition of the migration of macrophages by chromium salts.
    Polak L; Frey JR
    Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol; 1973; 44(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 4696542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The leucocyte migration test in chromium hypersensitivity.
    Thulin H; Zachariae H
    J Invest Dermatol; 1972 Feb; 58(2):55-8. PubMed ID: 5060297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Reactions to intracutaneous injections of 3 and 6 valent chromium compounds in sensitized men, pigs and guinea pigs].
    van Neer FC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1965 Sep; 109(36):1684. PubMed ID: 5827624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Study of the dynamics of experimental contact hypersensitivity using immunological tests].
    Jirová D; Janeckova V; Znojemská S; Pekárek J
    Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 1982 Sep; 31(5):298-304. PubMed ID: 6215997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Hypersensitivity for chromium compounds].
    Jansen LH; Berrens L
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1967 Aug; 111(31):1369-75. PubMed ID: 4865240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Serological observations on patients with chromium-eczema and chromium-sensibilized guinea-pigs.
    Penders AJ; Grosfeld JC
    Dermatologica; 1966; 132(2):177-8. PubMed ID: 5955343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thresholds of sensitivity in metal contact allergy. 1. Isolated and simultaneous allergy to chromium, cobalt, mercury and-or nickel.
    Wahlberg JE
    Berufsdermatosen; 1973 Feb; 21(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 4694383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chromium dermatitis from galvanized sheets.
    Fregert S; Gruvberger B; Heijer A
    Berufsdermatosen; 1970 Oct; 18(5):254-60. PubMed ID: 4256824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Studies on sensitization with chromium compounds using DMSO].
    Heise H; Mattheus A; Flegel H
    Allerg Asthma (Leipz); 1969; 15(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 5371338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Occupational skin damages by formaldehyde ethylamine (trimene base)].
    Weiler KJ
    Berufsdermatosen; 1970 Aug; 18(4):239-44. PubMed ID: 4256793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adjuvant activity of muramyldipeptide in a guinea pig model of contact allergy to chromium.
    Jírová D; Janecková V; Znojemská S; Pekárek J
    J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1983; 27(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 6663072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Mechanism of allergic chromium dermatitis].
    Sosonkin IE; Kalugin VV
    Vestn Dermatol Venerol; 1968; 42(9):28-31. PubMed ID: 4246494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. N-acetylcysteine inhibits chromium hypersensitivity in coadjuvant chromium-sensitized albino guinea pigs by suppressing the effects of reactive oxygen species.
    Wang BJ; Guo YL; Chang HY; Sheu HM; Pan MH; Lee YH; Wang YJ
    Exp Dermatol; 2010 Aug; 19(8):e191-200. PubMed ID: 20113346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Studies on contact sensitivity to chromium in the guinea pig. The role of valence in the formation of the antigenic determinant.
    Siegenthaler U; Laine A; Polak L
    J Invest Dermatol; 1983 Jan; 80(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 6184422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-sensitizing epicutaneous skin tests prevent subsequent induction of immune tolerance.
    van Hoogstraten IM; von Blomberg BM; Boden D; Kraal G; Scheper RJ
    J Invest Dermatol; 1994 Jan; 102(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 7507154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Dermatological incompatibility reaction to X5Cr-Ni-Mo 18.10 steel implants in animal experiments].
    Höhndorf H; Ziegler V; Brückner L
    Z Exp Chir; 1978; 11(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 735269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.