These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4702540)

  • 41. [Isodose neasurements on Stallard's cobalt 60 eye applicators. II. General computation of depth doses for circular area activities and the measurement of isodoses for the applicators CKA 8-11].
    Rassow J; Strüter HD; Magnus L; Göbbeler T
    Radiol Clin Biol; 1970; 39(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 5446215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A method to absorb scattered radiation without attenuation of the primary beam.
    Moore R; Korbuly D; Amplatz K
    Radiology; 1976 Sep; 120(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 948608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The cutoff characteristics of rotating grids.
    Bull KW; Curry TS; Dowdey JE; Christensen EE
    Radiology; 1975 Feb; 114(2):453-5. PubMed ID: 1111015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The evaluation of high-speed screen-film combinations in angiography.
    Ovitt TW; Moore R; Armplatz K
    Radiology; 1975 Feb; 114(2):449-52. PubMed ID: 1111014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Do high detail screens always yield better resolution than high speed screens?
    Rao GU
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1971 Aug; 112(4):812-7. PubMed ID: 5562748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect on image quality due to focal-spot variation in magnification radiography.
    Spiegler P; Grollman JH
    Invest Radiol; 1971; 6(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 5554273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Routine evaluation of focal spots.
    Bernstein H; Bergeron RT; Klein DJ
    Radiology; 1974 May; 111(2):421-5. PubMed ID: 4818983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Physicotechnical and dosimetric support of human whole-body irradiation in a standard medical source of photon radiation].
    Dudarev AL; Pereletov ON; Korytova LI; Shutko AN; Sinitsyn RV; Il'in NV; Mus VF
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1991; 36(12):30-4. PubMed ID: 1749329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The production of apparent image bifurcation.
    Trefler M; Gray JE; Milne EN; Roeck WW; Gillan G
    Radiology; 1976 May; 119(2):451-4. PubMed ID: 1265276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Radiographic detail and variation of the nominal focal spot size: the "focal effect".
    Katz MC; Nickoloff EL
    Radiographics; 1992 Jul; 12(4):753-61. PubMed ID: 1636037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A radiographic exposure calculator.
    Horsington G
    Radiography; 1974 Apr; 40(472):77-83. PubMed ID: 4829328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Formation of the dosage field in combined irradiation using a grid diaphragm].
    Vaĭnberg MSh
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1980 Feb; 25(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 7360021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Monte Carlo studies on the influence of focal spot size and intensity distribution on spatial resolution in magnification mammography.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(5):1369-84. PubMed ID: 18296767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Effect of the linear dimensions of the detector on the accuracy of dosage field registration].
    Denisenko ON
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1981 Apr; 26(4):44-5. PubMed ID: 7231066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Effect of intensifying screens on x-ray exposure contrast].
    Brandt GA; Preuss HJ; Menzel B
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1980; 21(2):251-9. PubMed ID: 7444037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Structural basis of an x-ray diagnostic device system].
    Chikirdin EG; Astrakhantsev FA
    Med Tekh; 1982; (1):23-8. PubMed ID: 7062822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [What effect do intensifying screens and general lack of resolution have on tomography?].
    Meiler J
    Rontgenblatter; 1973 Jan; 26(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 4791869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Quantitative organ-uptake measurement.
    Clarke LP; Laughlin JS; Mayer K
    Radiology; 1972 Feb; 102(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 5009942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effects of motion on the radiological image.
    Prasad SC; Edwards FM; Hendee WR
    Radiology; 1977 Jun; 123(3):763-6. PubMed ID: 870945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Tissue-air relations for therapeutic gamma apparatus].
    Vatnitskiĭ SM; Aalto R; Rannikko S
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1981 Nov; 26(11):75-80. PubMed ID: 7321794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.