These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Autokinesis and felt eye-position. Jordan S Am J Psychol; 1968 Dec; 81(4):497-512. PubMed ID: 5760031 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Subliminal and supraliminal accessory stimulation and two trapezoid illusions. Zenhausern R; Ciaiola M; Pompo C Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Aug; 37(1):251-6. PubMed ID: 4728011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Individual differences in sensitivity to interaural differences in time and level. McFadden D; Jeffress LA; Russell WE Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Dec; 37(3):755-61. PubMed ID: 4764506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Strength of auditory stimulus-response compatibility as a function of task complexity. Callan J; Klisz D; Parsons OA J Exp Psychol; 1974 Jun; 102(6):1039-45. PubMed ID: 4841325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Lateral asymmetry in judgments of click location: not an artifact of reporting mode. Bertelson P; Tisseyre F Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Jun; 36(3):849-50. PubMed ID: 4704335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reactions toward the stimulus source: analysis of correct responses and errors over a five-day period. Simon JR; Craft JL; Webster JB J Exp Psychol; 1973 Nov; 101(1):175-8. PubMed ID: 4759634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The development of auditory figure-ground discrimination and ear asymmetry under nonaural stimulus presentation. Howland A; Rasbury W; Heilman KM; Hammer L Dev Med Child Neurol; 1975 Jun; 17(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 1204986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An auditory illusion. Deutsch D Nature; 1974 Sep; 251(5473):307-9. PubMed ID: 4427654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between accuracy of report and ear-differences in dichotic listening. Nachshon I; Carmon A Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Oct; 37(2):653-4. PubMed ID: 4747402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Autokinesis and attention distribution: rejoinder to Starker. Voth HM Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Jun; 34(3):750. PubMed ID: 5040487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ear asymmetry in the discrimination of monaural tonal sequences. Doehring DG Can J Psychol; 1972 Mar; 26(1):106-10. PubMed ID: 4669571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ear differences and delayed auditory feedback: effect on a simple verbal repetition task and a nonverbal tapping test. Roberts LD; Gregory AH J Exp Psychol; 1973 Dec; 101(2):269-72. PubMed ID: 4753856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of masking-spectrum slope and interaural phase on detection of tones. Sonn M Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 4842432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ear asymmetry and delayed auditory feedback: effects of task requirements and competitive stimulation. Bradshaw JL; Nettleton NC; Geffen G J Exp Psychol; 1972 Aug; 94(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 5044276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The subliminal perception of movement and the course of autokinesis. Walker P; Meyer RR Br J Psychol; 1978 May; 69(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 656734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]