These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4704934)
1. Effect of recent Supreme Count Decision on Delaware's abortion law. Del Med J; 1973 May; 45(5):141-5. PubMed ID: 4704934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Delaware's hazardous chemical law. Uzych L Del Med J; 1985 Aug; 57(8):493-6, 501-2. PubMed ID: 4043445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law. Denniston L Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Delaware's abortion reforms. Moyer CM Del Med J; 1969 Jun; 41(6):199. PubMed ID: 5795846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Law in brief: abortion: the unanswered questions. Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1974 Jun; 48(11):108-12. PubMed ID: 4829883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. State legislation can lessen impact of Court's abortion decision. Stratton RW Hosp Prog; 1973 Oct; 54(10):8-9. PubMed ID: 4746788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Law of consent and abortion in California. Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1973 Feb; 47(3):132 passim. PubMed ID: 4684323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The vagueness of partial-birth abortion bans: deconstruction or destruction? Rurka ML J Crim Law Criminol; 1999; 89(4):1233-68. PubMed ID: 14628850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Fix Delaware's Affidavit of Merit law. Hacker JF Del Med J; 2006 Oct; 78(10):371-2. PubMed ID: 17076114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion law in the United States: the untoward Christian reaction to recent Supreme Court decisions. Crawford J Law Justice; 1974 19-32, Hilary 42:; No():. PubMed ID: 11663577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mississippi physicians' attitudes toward the Supreme Court abortion decision. Murray PT; Jew H J Miss State Med Assoc; 1974 Jul; 15(7):291-4. PubMed ID: 4841121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion and the law: the Supreme Court, privacy, and abortion. Marsh FH Adv Bioeth; 1997; 2():107-23. PubMed ID: 12348324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion choice and the law in Vermont: a recent study. Olmstead FH Vt Law Rev; 1982; 7(2):281-313. PubMed ID: 11655820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion 1980: the debate continues. Healey JM Conn Med; 1980 Sep; 44(9):605. PubMed ID: 7408487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Supreme Court and abortion: 2. Sidestepping social realities. Mechanic D Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):17-9. PubMed ID: 7007284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Law, morals and abortion: alternatives in light of the Supreme Court's decision. Degnan DA Commonweal; 1974 May; 100(13):305-8. PubMed ID: 11663441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The health system and the Supreme Court decision; An affirmative response. Knowles JH Fam Plann Perspect; 1973; 5(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 4805724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The constitutional validity of abortion legislation: a comparative note. Glenn HP McGill Law J; 1975; 21(4):673-84. PubMed ID: 11663622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Paternal interests in the abortion decision: does the father have a say? Diggins M Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1989; 1989():377-97. PubMed ID: 11656041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. So-called "partial birth abortion" bans: bad medicine? Maybe. Bad law? Definitely! Massie AM Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1998; 59(2):301-80. PubMed ID: 11902179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]