These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4705244)
1. Concept and rule utlization in the acquisition of an electrodermal response. Malloy TE; Proctor S J Exp Psychol; 1973 Mar; 97(3):370-7. PubMed ID: 4705244 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Stimulus compounding in free-operant and classical conditioning. A review and analysis. Weiss SJ Psychol Bull; 1972 Sep; 78(3):189-208. PubMed ID: 4560788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Orienting responses and personality variables as predictors of differential conditioning of electrodermal responses and awareness of stimulus relations. Fuhrer MJ; Baer PE; Cowan CO J Pers Soc Psychol; 1973 Aug; 27(2):287-96. PubMed ID: 4723975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrodermal responses and subjective estimates of UCS probability in a long interstimulus interval conditioning paradigm. Ohman A; Ellström PE; Björkstrand PA Psychophysiology; 1976 Mar; 13(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 1257373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Concurrent measurement of autonomic and cognitive processes in a test of the traditional discriminative control procedure for Pavlovian electrodermal conditioning. Furedy JJ; Schiffman K J Exp Psychol; 1973 Sep; 100(1):210-7. PubMed ID: 4744497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Concurrent measurement of awareness and electrodermal classical conditioning. Dawson ME; Biferno MA J Exp Psychol; 1973 Nov; 101(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 4759641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Acquisition of signal concepts with avoidance activation. II. Results of the learning study and discussion]. Grau U Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1973; 20(3):366-93. PubMed ID: 4757182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Differential GSR conditioning accompanied by a two-light prediction task. Hunt DP; Daily RF J Gen Psychol; 1974 Apr; 90(2d Half):165-77. PubMed ID: 4833495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Change in stimulus conditions and the orienting response. O'Gorman JG Psychophysiology; 1973 Sep; 10(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 4580621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of varying signaling and intensity of shock on an unconfounded and novel electrodermal autonomic index in a variable and long-interval classical trace conditioning paradigm. Furedy JJ; Ginsberg S Psychophysiology; 1973 Jul; 10(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 4719476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Temporal generalization of electrodermal orienting responses: comment. Ohman A Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Oct; 37(2):593-4. PubMed ID: 4747389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Are rules applied in Pavlovian electrodermal conditioning with humans general or outcome specific? Lachnit H; Kinder A; Reinhard G Psychophysiology; 2002 May; 39(3):380-7. PubMed ID: 12212657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross-modality transfer of differential galvanic skin response conditioning to word stimuli. Mandel IJ; Bridger WH J Exp Psychol; 1973 Jul; 99(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 4715313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction probability as a determiner of anticipatory and preparatory electrodermal behavior. Grings WW; Sukoneck HI J Exp Psychol; 1971 Dec; 91(2):310-7. PubMed ID: 5134675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fear generalization in humans: impact of feature learning on conditioning and extinction. Vervliet B; Geens M Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2014 Sep; 113():143-8. PubMed ID: 24120427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Generalization phenomena associated with previous pairings of UCS (shock) and subliminal visual stimuli. Worthington AG J Pers Soc Psychol; 1966 Jun; 3(6):634-40. PubMed ID: 5938999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Temporal conditioning as a function of instructions and intertrial interval. Harley JP J Exp Psychol; 1973 Sep; 100(1):178-84. PubMed ID: 4744493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Differential conditioning of electrodermal responses: effects of performing a masking task during the interstimulus and intertrial intervals. Wilson RA; Fuhrer MJ; Baer PE Biol Psychol; 1974; 2(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 4425718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrodermal responses as affected by subject- versus experimenter-controlled noxious stimulation. Björkstrand PA J Exp Psychol; 1973 Mar; 97(3):365-9. PubMed ID: 4705243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]