These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Getting off on the wrong foot: the timing of a breach and the restoration of trust. Lount RB; Zhong CB; Sivanathan N; Murnighan JK Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1601-12. PubMed ID: 19050335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conflict behavior in clinical families: preasymptotic interactions and stable outcomes. Santa-Barbara J; Epstein NB Behav Sci; 1974 Mar; 19(2):100-10. PubMed ID: 4815336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Personality and Behavior in Social Dilemmas: Testing the Situational Strength Hypothesis and the Role of Hypothetical Versus Real Incentives. Lozano JH J Pers; 2016 Feb; 84(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 25255905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Playing the manic game. Interpersonal maneuvers of the acutely manic patient. Janowsky DS; Leff M; Epstein RS Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1970 Mar; 22(3):252-61. PubMed ID: 5413274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The name of the game: predictive power of reputations versus situational labels in determining prisoner's dilemma game moves. Liberman V; Samuels SM; Ross L Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1175-85. PubMed ID: 15359020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interpersonal conflict-handling behavior as reflections of Jungian personality dimensions. Kilmann RH; Thomas KW Psychol Rep; 1975 Dec; 37(3 Pt 1):971-80. PubMed ID: 1197571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Conflict and sociometric status. Game theory studies in children from 30 primary classes in grades 6 to 8]. Pulkowski-Rebellius HB Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1973; 125(2):113-38. PubMed ID: 4603428 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Who abuses their coworkers? An examination of personality and situational variables. Harris KJ; Harvey P; Booth SL J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(6):608-27. PubMed ID: 21166327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conflict between individual and common interest in an N-person relationship. Kelley HH; Grzelak J J Pers Soc Psychol; 1972 Feb; 21(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 5010402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Coordination success and interpersonal perceptions: matching versus mismatching. Abele S; Stasser G J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Sep; 95(3):576-92. PubMed ID: 18729695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of forced assocation upon voluntary choice to associate. Berscheid E; Boye D; Darley JM J Pers Soc Psychol; 1968 Jan; 8(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 5638017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceptions of self and other in the prisoner's dilemma: outcome bias and evidential reasoning. Krueger JI; Acevedo M Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(4):593-618. PubMed ID: 18277518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: the case for agreeableness. Graziano WG; Jensen-Campbell LA; Hair EC J Pers Soc Psychol; 1996 Apr; 70(4):820-35. PubMed ID: 8636901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of predictions from consistency and affect theories for arousal during interpersonal disagreement. Gormly J J Pers Soc Psychol; 1974 Nov; 30(5):658-63. PubMed ID: 4443886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Revisiting the form and function of conflict: Neurobiological, psychological, and cultural mechanisms for attack and defense within and between groups. De Dreu CKW; Gross J Behav Brain Sci; 2018 Sep; 42():e116. PubMed ID: 30251617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Personality and organization theory: a review of some conceptual literature. Lichtman CM; Hunt RG Psychol Bull; 1971 Oct; 76(4):271-94. PubMed ID: 4939658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]