These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4707975)

  • 1. Development of a method of X-ray densitometry for bone mineral measurement.
    Griffith ER; Stonebridge JB; Piernick D; Lehman JF
    Am J Phys Med; 1973 Jun; 52(3):128-49. PubMed ID: 4707975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone mineral measurement using an EMI scanner and standard methods: a comparative study.
    Pullan BR; Roberts TE
    Br J Radiol; 1978 Jan; 51(601):24-8. PubMed ID: 620115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative in-vivo determination of bone mineral using computerized roentgenographic densitometry.
    Price RI; Retallack RW; Gutteridge DH; Black JL; Glancy J; Hughes D; Munslow-Davies L; Uitermark E; Mallal SA
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1983; 6(3):128-37. PubMed ID: 6679276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Bone and bone marrow scintigraphy and measurement of bone mineral density by photon absorptiometry in osteopetrosis].
    Otsuka N; Fukunaga M; Morita K; Ono S; Nagai K; Yanagimoto S; Tomomitsu T; Furukawa T; Morita R
    Kaku Igaku; 1988 Mar; 25(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 3398300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Systematic errors during radiological determinations of bone mineral content (author's transl)].
    Rassow J
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1974 Jul; 121(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 4369686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Possibilities and limitations of objective radiological methods for the determination of bone mineral content using comparative absorption measurements].
    Kriester A
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1968 Aug; 109(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 5692662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single photon absorptiometry and quantitative roentgenography in bone densitometry: a comparison.
    Price RI; Retallack RW; Gutteridge DH
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1988; 11(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 3365167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Radiologic mineral equivalent determination in bones. 1. The correct use of the radiologic substance analysis by means of different qualities of radiation].
    Gebhardt M; Zwicker H
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1970 Jun; 112(6):798-805. PubMed ID: 5534140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bone mineral measurements in clinical practice.
    Murby B; Fogelman I
    Br J Hosp Med; 1987 May; 37(5):453-8. PubMed ID: 3580698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Increasing the accuracy of the stereoroentgenophotometric method of studying mineral saturation of the bones].
    Chernyĭ AN; Druzhinin VN; Gaĭnedinov SM
    Med Tekh; 1988; (3):36-40. PubMed ID: 3419312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry for bone densitometry: current status and perspective.
    Sartoris DJ; Resnick D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Feb; 152(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 2643257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Photodensitometry of bone roentgenograms with an on-line computer.
    Colbert C; Garrett C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1969; 65():39-45. PubMed ID: 5805338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proceedings: An electronic device for direct readout of bone mineral content from roentgenograms scanned with a microphotodensitometer.
    Wing KR; Birring E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1976 Jun; 126(6):1269-70. PubMed ID: 179397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative assessment of bone density on X-ray picture.
    Inoue T; Kusida K; Miyamoto S; Sumi Y; Orimo H; Yamashita G
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Dec; 57(12):1923-36. PubMed ID: 6676402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Equipment for in vivo study of the mineral component of bone].
    Simakov VV; Komissarova EN
    Arkh Anat Gistol Embriol; 1987 Feb; 92(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 3579626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Effect of aging on bone mineral content. Part VI. Comparison of bone mineral measurement with single photon absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry].
    Shiraki M; Inoue J; Ito H; Yamada H; DeSouza AC; Orimo H
    Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi; 1988 Nov; 25(6):591-6. PubMed ID: 3241446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of bone mineral. Part 1.
    Wahner HW; Dunn WL; Riggs BL
    J Nucl Med; 1984 Oct; 25(10):1134-41. PubMed ID: 6384440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. X-ray dual-photon absorptiometry: a new method for the measurement of bone density.
    Cullum ID; Ell PJ; Ryder JP
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Jul; 62(739):587-92. PubMed ID: 2758245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of the Nordin index and CT densitometry in the study of the variation of bone mineralization in vivo].
    Ferrari F; Barbini P; Terrosi-Vagnoli P; Stuart C
    Radiol Med; 1982; 68(1-2):41-3. PubMed ID: 7079534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The estimation of bone mineral content at selected skeletal sites by gamma-ray absorption.
    Smith CB; Horton PW; Aitken JM; Smith DA
    Br J Radiol; 1974 Jun; 47(558):314-8. PubMed ID: 4835208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.