These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4708127)

  • 1. The efficacy of the Canter Background Interference Procedure in identifying children with cerebral dysfunction.
    Adams J; Kenny TJ; Canter A
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1973 Jun; 40(3):489. PubMed ID: 4708127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Background Interference Procedure: a means of assessing neurologic dysfunction in school-age children.
    Kenny TJ
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1971 Aug; 37(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 5565626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Diagnosis of minimal cerebral dysfunction or lesion in school age children].
    Rebollo MA; Cardús S; Ihlenfeld S; Montero O
    Acta Neurol Latinoam; 1970; 16(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 5538049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of serial position on Bender-Gestalt errors using Koppitz's criteria.
    Nyfield B; Patalano F
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Dec; 83(3 Pt 2):1227-37. PubMed ID: 10079721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age effects and revised scoring of the Canter BIP for identifying children with cerebral dysfunction.
    Adams J; Kenny TJ; Peterson RA; Canter A
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1975 Feb; 43(1):117-8. PubMed ID: 1114233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of the Canter Background interference Procedure for differentiating among the schizophrenias.
    Horine LC; Fulkerson SC
    J Pers Assess; 1973 Feb; 37(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 4694568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic profiles of four types of learning disabled children.
    Hartlage LC
    J Clin Psychol; 1973 Oct; 29(4):458-63. PubMed ID: 4766720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cerebral dysfunctions--clarification, delineation, classification.
    Block WM
    Behav Neuropsychiatry; 1973 Oct-1974 Mar; 5(7-12):13-7. PubMed ID: 4139948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychological assessment of children with minimal brain dysfunction.
    Conners CK
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1973 Feb; 205():283-302. PubMed ID: 4570234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can projective test measures aid in the detection and differential diagnosis of reading deficit?
    Stavrianos BK
    J Pers Assess; 1971 Feb; 35(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 4950143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of children with and without learning disabilities on Canter's Background Interference Procedure and Koppitz's scoring system for the Bender test.
    Mitchell-Burns JA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Jun; 90(3 Pt 1):875-82. PubMed ID: 10883769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross validation of the Quast and Koppitz Bender-Gestalt signs of cerebral dysfunction.
    Holroyd J
    J Clin Psychol; 1966 Apr; 22(2):200. PubMed ID: 5937047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bender-Gestalt test and background interference procedure in discernment of organic brain damage.
    Pardue AM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Feb; 40(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 1118248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Centration-distortion error: a criterion of perceptual dysfunction.
    Mecke V
    Behav Neuropsychiatry; 1974 Apr-1975 Mar; 6(1-12):31-5. PubMed ID: 4468761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A process approach to the Bender-Gestalt test and its use in differentiating schizophrenic, brain-damaged, and medical patients.
    Mermelstein JJ
    J Clin Psychol; 1983 Mar; 39(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 6841616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two aspects of scorer reliability in the Bender-Gestalt test.
    Morsbach G; Priori CD; Furnell J
    J Clin Psychol; 1975 Jan; 31(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 1112908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interrater reliability of the Koppitz Developmental Scoring method in the clinical evaluation of the single case.
    Svensson PW; Hill MA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Apr; 70(2):615-23. PubMed ID: 2342865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of normal and emotionally disturbed children by the Plenk scoring system for the Bender Gestalt.
    Watkins JM; Watkins DA
    J Clin Psychol; 1975 Jan; 31(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 1112904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Curve-fitting as a method of statistical correction of developmental norms, shown on the example of the Bender-Koppitz test.
    Choynowski M
    J Clin Psychol; 1970 Apr; 26(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 5418122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the Bender Gestalt test for both black and white brain-damaged patients using two scoring systems.
    Butler OT; Coursey RD; Gatz M
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1976 Apr; 44(2):280-5. PubMed ID: 1254762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.