94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 470848)
1. Evaluation of a new x-ray film with reduced crossover.
Rao GU; Fatouros PP
Med Phys; 1979; 6(3):226-8. PubMed ID: 470848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of crossover exposure on radiographic image quality of screen-film systems.
Doi K; Loo LN; Anderson TM; Frank PH
Radiology; 1981 Jun; 139(3):707-14. PubMed ID: 7232738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of four rare-earth film-screen combinations.
Nettle JR; Ritchings RT
Br J Radiol; 1980 Oct; 53(634):965-8. PubMed ID: 7426919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system.
Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [New intensifying screens in clinical radiology. Paper I-Experimental investigations (author's transl)].
Hagemann G; Töllner D; Saure D; Freyschmidt J
Rofo; 1976 May; 124(5):483-9. PubMed ID: 133903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of new film high-light system by comparison with conventional film.
Gray JE; Capp MP; Freundlich IM
Radiol Technol; 1975; 47(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 1144735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
Farman TT; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of radiographs developed by a new ultrarapid film processing system.
Schmidt RA; Doi K; Sekiya M; Xu XW; Giger ML; Lu CT; Mojtahedi S; MacMahon H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 May; 154(5):1107-10. PubMed ID: 2108553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The reduction of the radiation dosage by means of storage phosphor-film radiography compared to a conventional film-screen system with a grid cassette on a skull phantom].
Heyne JP; Merbold H; Sehner J; Neumann R; Freesmeyer M; Jonetz-Mentzel L; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10464506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-speed, single-screen/single-emulsion film systems: basic imaging properties and preliminary clinical applications.
Higashida Y; Frank PH; Doi K
Radiology; 1983 Nov; 149(2):571-7. PubMed ID: 6622705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance comparison of an active matrix flat panel imager, computed radiography system, and a screen-film system at four standard radiation qualities.
Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):343-50. PubMed ID: 15789578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metal screen-film detector MTF at megavoltage x-ray energies.
Droege RT; Bjärngard BE
Med Phys; 1979; 6(6):515-8. PubMed ID: 545122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exposure reduction through faster speed film-screen systems and a review of A.L.A.R.A. (as low as reasonably achievable).
Nickoli PC
Can J Med Radiat Technol; 1993 Aug; 24(3):98-107. PubMed ID: 10127889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relative speeds of Kodak computed radiography phosphors and screen-film systems.
Huda W; Rill LN; Bruner AP
Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1621-8. PubMed ID: 9350716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitometric and image quality performance of "rapid" intraoral film processing techniques.
Czajka J; Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K
Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):49-58. PubMed ID: 8785621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the 3M Trimax system.
Marsh AJ
Radiography; 1978 Feb; 44(518):56-8. PubMed ID: 625550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Selection of optimal screen-film combination for use in the neonatal intensive care unit.
Smith WL; Franken EA; Frangi SM; Windsor C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Dec; 139(6):1051-3. PubMed ID: 6756100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Secondary photon scatter in imaging cassettes.
McLean D
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1998 Sep; 21(3):101-11. PubMed ID: 9848944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
