These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 470848)

  • 21. Problems associated with simulated light sensitometry for low-crossover medical x-ray films.
    Haus AG; Dickerson RE
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(4):691-5. PubMed ID: 2215416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sensitometric effects of varying the intensifying screens used with Agfa Dentus ST8G and RP6 panoramic radiographic films.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Kitagawa H; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 9442613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Are high-intensifying film-screen combinations suitable for the detection of fine interstitial lung changes? The results of a ROC study with an anthropomorphic thorax phantom].
    Müller RD; John V; Voss M; Buddenbrock B; Blendl C; Hirche H; Ewen K; Löhr E
    Rofo; 1993 Jul; 159(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 8334259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of scanning equalization and conventional chest radiography.
    Wandtke JC; Plewes DB
    Radiology; 1989 Sep; 172(3):641-5. PubMed ID: 2772170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10522195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Value of increasing film processing time to reduce radiation dose during mammography.
    Skubic SE; Yagan R; Oravec D; Shah Z
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Dec; 155(6):1189-93. PubMed ID: 2122664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Method of simulated screen sensitometry for asymmetric, low crossover medical x-ray films.
    Dickerson RE; Haus AG; Baker CW
    Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):525-8. PubMed ID: 8058018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Diagnosis of metastases in thoracic images. Progress by further development of the conventional film-foil technique?].
    Lehmann KJ; Himmighöfer U
    Radiologe; 1994 Oct; 34(10):592-8. PubMed ID: 7816917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Complex evaluation of film mammographic imaging systems. 2. Comparison of 18 systems using a signal-noise matrix].
    Friedrich M; Weskamp P
    Rofo; 1984 Jun; 140(6):707-16. PubMed ID: 6429790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Evaluation of CRT images of digitized film angiographs].
    Mashita S; Ishigaki T; Ikeda M; Sakuma S
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 49(8):1025-37. PubMed ID: 2594482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Quality control of laser imagers].
    Winkelbauer F; Ammann M; Gerstner N; Imhof H
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Nov; 2(6):334-8. PubMed ID: 1457474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Characteristics of Kodak Insight, an F-speed intraoral film.
    Ludlow JB; Platin E; Mol A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):120-9. PubMed ID: 11174582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of two different T-grain films in rare-earth screens with a standard film-screen combination for intravenous pyelography and bone examinations.
    Logan H; Daly L; Masterson J
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Mar; 62(735):237-40. PubMed ID: 2702380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Processing of mammographic films: technical and clinical considerations.
    Tabar L; Haus AG
    Radiology; 1989 Oct; 173(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 2781032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Experimental study of intensifying screens used in diagnostic radiography (author's transl)].
    de Moras Y; Lucas P; Fauduet A; Pelgas MF; Serrurot M; Bausmayer J
    J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1978 Mar; 59(3):213-21. PubMed ID: 650634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Optimization of the thoracic radiograph. Experimental and clinical study on the use of various film/screen combinations using rare earths].
    Bergonzini R; Gallini R; Giugni U; Robecchi D; Amato M
    Radiol Med; 1986 May; 72(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 3715076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of mammographic screen-film systems.
    Arnold BA; Webster EW; Kalisher L
    Radiology; 1978 Oct; 129(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 693873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A study of the effects of lead foil in dental X-ray film packets on radiographic image quality.
    Araki K; Kanda S; Toyofuku F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):179-82. PubMed ID: 8181643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography.
    Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Manke C; Albrich H; Feuerbach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9648757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Characterization of new portal film systems for radiotherapy verification.
    Langmack KA; Goss V
    Br J Radiol; 1999 May; 72(857):479-84. PubMed ID: 10505013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.