These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 470848)

  • 41. Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom: detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
    Strotzer M; Völk M; Wild T; von Landenberg P; Feuerbach S
    Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):512-5. PubMed ID: 10796933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Mammographic film-processor temperature, development time, and chemistry: effect on dose, contrast, and noise.
    Kimme-Smith C; Rothschild PA; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Moler C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Jan; 152(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 2783288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Sensitometric evaluation of a new F-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11175270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [High-contrast resolution of film-screen systems in oral and maxillofacial radiology].
    Kaeppler G; Reinert S
    Rofo; 2007 Nov; 179(11):1145-51. PubMed ID: 17805997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Physical characteristics of four roentgenographic chains proposed for chest radiography.
    Manninen H; Pitkänen M; Wiljasalo M
    Br J Radiol; 1982 Dec; 55(660):891-6. PubMed ID: 7171933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Resolution in radiographic magnification.
    Wagner LK; Cohen G; Wong WH; Amtey SR
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(3):382-4. PubMed ID: 7322061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Dose requirement and definition of the image with new types of mammographic systems (author's transl)].
    Frost D; Krause RA
    Strahlentherapie; 1980 Nov; 156(11):770-5. PubMed ID: 7434387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sensitometric evaluation of a new E-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 8593905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A comparative physical evaluation of four X-ray films.
    Egyed M; Shearer DR
    Radiol Manage; 1981 Sep; 3(4):11-20. PubMed ID: 10253292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Quality assurance through constancy control for x-ray film processors (author's transl)].
    Weberling R
    Rontgenblatter; 1982 Jun; 35(6):248-54. PubMed ID: 7089438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Image quality comparisons of X-Omat RP, L and B films.
    Van Dis ML; Beck FM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):132-4. PubMed ID: 1807996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Technique charts for Kodak EC-L film screen system for portal localization in a 6MV X-ray beam.
    Sandilos P; Antypas C; Paraskevopoulou C; Kouvaris J; Vlachos L
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 17148858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Technical note. Evaluation of a new screen/film combination.
    Evans AL; Davison M; McLellan J; James WB
    Br J Radiol; 1975 Oct; 48(574):858-9. PubMed ID: 1191907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Application of intensigying screens on the basis of rare earths (author's transl)].
    Maurer HJ; Brandelik E; Goos F
    Radiologe; 1977 Jul; 17(7):305-9. PubMed ID: 897142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Dose comparisons for mammographic systems.
    Speiser RC; Zanrosso EM; Jeromin LS; Carlson RA
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 3784994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of screen/film combinations on diagnostic certainty: Hi-Plus/RPL versus Lanex/Ortho G in excretory urography.
    Thornbury JR; Fryback DG; Patterson FE; Chiavarini RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jan; 130(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 413423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Thoracic radiography in intensive care units. Comparison of an asymmetric film-screen-grid combination with an L-film].
    Luska G; von Boetticher H; Amling B; Herzog R
    Rofo; 1995 Aug; 163(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 7670010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Absolute speeds of screen-film systems and their absorbed-energy constants.
    Kodera Y; Doi K; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1984 Apr; 151(1):229-36. PubMed ID: 6701320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2617-31. PubMed ID: 15901958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Reduction of patient dose with maximum assurance of image quality].
    Kuhn H
    Rontgenblatter; 1985 Jul; 38(7):224-30. PubMed ID: 4035266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.