These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4711975)
1. Extraneous lateral stimulation and distribution of errors within tachistoscopic patterns. Nice DS Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Jun; 36(3):1234. PubMed ID: 4711975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Does cerebral dominance offer a sufficient explanation for laterality differences in tachistoscopic recognition? White MJ Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Apr; 36(2):479-85. PubMed ID: 4690737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Integrating audiovisual information for the control of overt attention. Onat S; Libertus K; König P J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):11.1-16. PubMed ID: 17997680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Some factors in the recognition of tachistoscopically presented alphabetical arrays. Fudin R; Kenny JT Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Dec; 35(3):951-9. PubMed ID: 4643992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Does post-exposural directional scanning offer a sufficient explanation for lateral differences in tachistoscopic recognition? McKeever WF Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Feb; 38(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 4815516 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Tachistoscopic hemifield effects with hemifield report. Coltheart M; Arthur B Am J Psychol; 1971 Sep; 84(3):355-64. PubMed ID: 5142582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of degree of separation of visual-auditory stimulus and eye position upon spatial interaction of vision and audition. Bermant RI; Welch RB Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Oct; 42(43):487-93. PubMed ID: 980644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laterality differences in perception: a review. White MJ Psychol Bull; 1969 Dec; 72(6):387-405. PubMed ID: 4905908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Parellel and serial processing in tachistoscopic recognition: two mechanisms. Dick AO J Exp Psychol; 1972 Nov; 96(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 5083131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Developmental differences in the field of view during tachistoscopic presentation. Miller LK Child Dev; 1971 Nov; 42(5):1543-51. PubMed ID: 5156651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A further test of the scanning hypothesis in tachistoscopic recognition. Scheerer E Can J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 27(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 4696075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Eye movements in reading and information processing. Rayner K Psychol Bull; 1978 May; 85(3):618-60. PubMed ID: 353867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of a supplementary visual task on intensity threshold during voluntary saccades. Mitrani L; Yakimoff N; Mateeff S Act Nerv Super (Praha); 1972 Nov; 14(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 5083825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual processing schema: a theory of perception. Tayal OP J Gen Psychol; 1971 Jul; 85(1st Half):3-28. PubMed ID: 5566734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of central processes in the perception of visual after-images. Davies P Br J Psychol; 1973 Aug; 64(3):325-38. PubMed ID: 4750261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhancing the perception of form in peripheral vision. Geiger G; Lettvin JY Perception; 1986; 15(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 3774483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of reference points and masking on tachistoscopic pattern perception. Monti PM Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Jun; 34(3):923-40. PubMed ID: 5040512 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Order of report and order of scanning in tachistoscopic recognition. Scheerer E Can J Psychol; 1972 Dec; 26(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 4656820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Early multisensory interactions affect the competition among multiple visual objects. Van der Burg E; Talsma D; Olivers CN; Hickey C; Theeuwes J Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):1208-18. PubMed ID: 21195781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]