These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 471369)

  • 1. A comparison of different methods of instrumental delivery based on electronic measurements of compression and traction.
    Moolgaoker AS; Ahamed SO; Payne PR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Sep; 54(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 471369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Some considerations on forceps delivery with excenter handle (author's transl)].
    Janisch H; Altmann P; Leodolter S; Reinold E
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1975 Oct; 179(5):339-45. PubMed ID: 1210477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Kielland's forceps delivery: is it a dying art?
    Tan KH; Sim R; Yam KL
    Singapore Med J; 1992 Aug; 33(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 1411670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown K; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 66(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 3900836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Instrumental rotational delivery in primiparae.
    Gleeson NC; Gormally SM; Morrison JJ; O'Regan M
    Ir Med J; 1992 Dec; 85(4):139-41. PubMed ID: 1473948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries.
    Mesleh RA; Al-Sawadi HM; Kurdi AM
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Jul; 23(7):811-3. PubMed ID: 12174231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of maternal and fetal effects of vacuum extraction with forceps or cesarean deliveries.
    Greis JB; Bieniarz J; Scommegna A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 May; 57(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 7219906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Should we abandon Kielland's forceps?
    Cardozo LD; Gibb DM; Studd JW; Cooper DJ
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Jul; 287(6388):315-7. PubMed ID: 6409289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [About the choice of extraction instrument for vaginal operative termination in vertex presentation (author's transl)].
    Altmann P; Georgiades E; Reinold E; Wagenbichler P
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1975 Dec; 35(12):949-55. PubMed ID: 1213260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Ilorin University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
    Anate M
    West Afr J Med; 1991; 10(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 1911480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries.
    Johnson JH; Figueroa R; Garry D; Elimian A; Maulik D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 14990415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Connexions between instrumental delivery and cerebral damage in the infant (author's transl)].
    Naske R; Poustka F; Presslich O; Schubert H; Zapotoczky HG; Altmann P; Schaller A
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1976 May; 88(10):319-24. PubMed ID: 997523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kielland's forceps or ventouse--a comparison.
    Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Boonrangsimant P
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 May; 95(5):483-7. PubMed ID: 3401434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
    Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neonatal acid-base balance in spontaneous and instrumental vaginal deliveries.
    Livnat EJ; Fejgin M; Scommegna A; Bieniarz J; Burd L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Nov; 52(5):549-51. PubMed ID: 31586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized comparison of assisted vaginal delivery by obstetric forceps and polyethylene vacuum cup.
    Williams MC; Knuppel RA; O'Brien WF; Weiss A; Kanarek KS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):789-94. PubMed ID: 1923198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Kielland's forceps: does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study.
    Gauthaman N; Henry D; Ster IC; Khunda A; Doumouchtsis SK
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1525-32. PubMed ID: 25990206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.