These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4716107)
1. Automated interpretation of the Mackay-Marg tonograph by digital computer. Pryor TA Comput Biomed Res; 1973 Jun; 6(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 4716107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinical value of new tonometers]. Schwartz R; Draeger J; Wirt H; Rumberger E; Dauper J; Deutsch C Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 2323695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening in general practice. Hodes C Lancet; 1968 Jun; 1(7555):1304-6. PubMed ID: 4172154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Clinical evaluation of Halberg's and Mackay-Marg tonometers]. Bucci MG; Romani E Boll Ocul; 1970 Jul; 49(7):366-73. PubMed ID: 5514042 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [ProTon--a new portable tonometer. Initial experimental and clinical results]. Sachs H; Lohmann CP; Scherbauer M; Gabel VP Ophthalmologe; 1995 Aug; 92(4):574-6. PubMed ID: 7549350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical comparison of the tonomat applanation tonometer with the Mackay-Marg electronic tonometer. Hill JF; Hill PJ Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom; 1969 Oct; 46(10):797-800. PubMed ID: 5259640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical comparative pressure studies with Goldmann; Mackay-Marg and pneumatic applanation tonometers. Jain MR; Marmion VJ Indian J Ophthalmol; 1977 Oct; 25(3):29-35. PubMed ID: 614270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Measurement of ocular tension in the newborn with the Mackay-Marg electronic tonometer]. Trux E; Follmann P Bull Mem Soc Fr Ophtalmol; 1969; 82():48-53. PubMed ID: 5402423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated multiphasic health testing. A review of AMHT centers. Hospitals; 1971 Mar; 45(5):75-87. PubMed ID: 5546692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Tonogram reading by digital computer. Dallow RL; Adler A; Weihrer AL; Urweider HA; Caceres CA Am J Ophthalmol; 1970 Dec; 70(6):922-8. PubMed ID: 4923309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Appraisal of the Mackay-Marg electronic tonometer in adults. Follmann P; Kárpáti A Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1969; 178(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 5306794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the posner tonomat and the Mackay-Marg tonometers. Brisbane WN Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom; 1969 Oct; 46(10):795-7. PubMed ID: 5259639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of MacKay-Marg, Goldmann, and Perkins tonometers in abnormal corneas. McMillan F; Forster RK Arch Ophthalmol; 1975 Jun; 93(6):420-4. PubMed ID: 805582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity of MacKay-Marg applanation tonometry following penetrating keratoplasty in man. Wind CA; Kaufman HE Am J Ophthalmol; 1971 Jul; 72(1):117-8. PubMed ID: 4936922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Tono-Pen. A manometric and clinical study. Boothe WA; Lee DA; Panek WC; Pettit TH Arch Ophthalmol; 1988 Sep; 106(9):1214-7. PubMed ID: 3415545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of corneal parameters on measurements using the pulsatile ocular blood flow tonograph and Goldmann applanation tonometer. Gunvant P; Baskaran M; Vijaya L; Joseph IS; Watkins RJ; Nallapothula M; Broadway DC; O'Leary DJ Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Apr; 88(4):518-22. PubMed ID: 15031169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of applanation tonometers for the dog eye. Gelatt KN; Peiffer RL; Gum GG; Gwin RM; Erickson JL Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1977 Oct; 16(10):963-8. PubMed ID: 908649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]