34 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 471677)
1. Reversed Depth in Anticorrelated Random-Dot Stereograms and the Central-Peripheral Difference in Visual Inference.
Zhaoping L; Ackermann J
Perception; 2018 Jan; ():301006618758571. PubMed ID: 29514559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revealing the Concealed: Alternatives to Random Dots for Stereograms.
Wade NJ
Vision (Basel); 2023 Dec; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 38133481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On Stereoscopic Art.
Wade NJ
Iperception; 2021; 12(3):20416695211007146. PubMed ID: 34104379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceived depth reversals of images on a concave screen.
Gu X; Yu H; Ito H; Kanematsu T
Iperception; 2024; 15(3):20416695241249945. PubMed ID: 38736566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Nature and Timing of Tele-Pseudoscopic Experiences.
Palmisano S; Hill H; Allison RS
Iperception; 2016; 7(1):2041669515625793. PubMed ID: 27482368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reversing the eyes and reverse perspectives: Pseudoscopic amplification of reverspectives.
Wade NJ; Hughes P
Iperception; 2023; 14(6):20416695231215406. PubMed ID: 38025963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noise, multisensory integration, and previous response in perceptual disambiguation.
Parise CV; Ernst MO
PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jul; 13(7):e1005546. PubMed ID: 28692700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic 3-D computer graphics for designing a diagnostic tool for patients with schizophrenia.
Farkas A; Papathomas TV; Silverstein SM; Kourtev H; Papayanopoulos JF
Vis Comput; 2016 Nov; 32(11):1499-1506. PubMed ID: 27990037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In pursuit of perspective: does vertical perspective disambiguate depth from motion parallax?
George JM; Johnson JI; Nawrot M
Perception; 2013; 42(6):631-41. PubMed ID: 24422245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Voluntarily controlled bi-stable slant perception of real and photographed surfaces.
van Ee R; Krumina G; Pont S; van der Ven S
Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Jan; 272(1559):141-8. PubMed ID: 15695204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of occlusion to resolve ambiguity in parallel projections.
Braunstein ML; Anderson GJ; Riefer DM
Percept Psychophys; 1982 Mar; 31(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 7088669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Interhemispherical comparisons in the processing of contour and random texture sinewave stereograms.
Shipley T; Garfinkel R; van Houten P
Doc Ophthalmol; 1984 Nov; 58(3):269-305. PubMed ID: 6518980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recovering viewer-centered depth from disparity, occlusion, and velocity gradients.
Braunstein ML; Andersen GJ; Rouse MW; Tittle JS
Percept Psychophys; 1986 Oct; 40(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 3786089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A spatial frequency effect on perceived depth.
Brown JM; Weisstein N
Percept Psychophys; 1988 Aug; 44(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 3405742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Depth inversion despite stereopsis: the appearance of random-dot stereograms on surfaces seen in reverse perspective.
Yellott JI; Kaiwi JL
Perception; 1979; 8(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 471677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pseudoscopic viewing: transfer and persistence of reversed depth relations from the viewing of photographs to the real scene.
Kalaugher PG
Perception; 1987; 16(3):359-74. PubMed ID: 3432031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Depth inversion in random-dot stereograms.
Frisby JP; Mayhew JE
Perception; 1979; 8(4):397-9. PubMed ID: 503770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Learning to see random-dot stereograms.
O'Toole AJ; Kersten DJ
Perception; 1992; 21(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 1513672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward a new theory of stereopsis.
Vishwanath D
Psychol Rev; 2014 Apr; 121(2):151-78. PubMed ID: 24730596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
