95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 471679)
1. Does visual texture discrimination precede binocular fusion?
Frisby JP; Mayhew JE
Perception; 1979; 8(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 471679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of monocular regions in stereoscopic displays.
Gillam B; Borsting E
Perception; 1988; 17(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 3249668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pseudoscopic viewing: transfer and persistence of reversed depth relations from the viewing of photographs to the real scene.
Kalaugher PG
Perception; 1987; 16(3):359-74. PubMed ID: 3432031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stereopsis and binocular rivalry.
Wolfe JM
Psychol Rev; 1986 Jul; 93(3):269-82. PubMed ID: 3749398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Texture discrimination at the cyclopean retina.
Pérez-Martínez D
Perception; 1995; 24(7):771-86. PubMed ID: 8710440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning to see random-dot stereograms.
O'Toole AJ; Kersten DJ
Perception; 1992; 21(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 1513672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Configurational differences in stereovision.
Bacon J; Wallach H
Perception; 1982; 11(5):607-13. PubMed ID: 7186113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simulation of curved surfaces from patterns of optical texture.
Todd JT; Mingolla E
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Oct; 10(5):734-9. PubMed ID: 6238130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rehabilitation of a classical notion of Panum's fusional area.
Krol JD; van de Grind WA
Perception; 1982; 11(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 7186114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How does adaptation to disparity affect the perception of reversible figures?
Harris JP
Am J Psychol; 1980 Sep; 93(3):445-57. PubMed ID: 7212126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stereoscopic surface interpolation supports lightness constancy.
Wilcox LM; Duke PA
Psychol Sci; 2003 Sep; 14(5):525-30. PubMed ID: 12930488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stereoscopic depth: its relation to image segmentation, grouping, and the recognition of occluded objects.
Nakayama K; Shimojo S; Silverman GH
Perception; 1989; 18(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 2771595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Local binocular fusion is involved in global binocular rivalry.
Takase S; Yukumatsu S; Bingushi K
Vision Res; 2008 Aug; 48(17):1798-803. PubMed ID: 18585751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Depth inversion despite stereopsis: the appearance of random-dot stereograms on surfaces seen in reverse perspective.
Yellott JI; Kaiwi JL
Perception; 1979; 8(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 471677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The binocular fusion of human vision on stereoscopic displays--field of view and environment effects.
Nagata S
Ergonomics; 1996 Nov; 39(11):1273-84. PubMed ID: 8888639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Depth interpolation with sparse disparity cues.
Würger SM; Landy MS
Perception; 1989; 18(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 2771593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Pulfrich effect: filtering portions of both eyes.
Landrigan DT; Bader IA
J Psychol; 1981 Nov; 109(2d Half):165-72. PubMed ID: 7299714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Asymmetrical effect of crossed and uncrossed disparity on stereoscopic capture.
Ishigushi A; Wolfe JM
Perception; 1993; 22(12):1403-13. PubMed ID: 8090618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reflections on principal principles of reflections.
Gregory RL
Perception; 1993; 22(7):757-8. PubMed ID: 8115233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Flicker induces depth: spatial and temporal factors in the perceptual segregation of flickering and nonflickering regions in depth.
Wong E; Weisstein N
Percept Psychophys; 1984 Mar; 35(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 6728621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
