These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4717546)
1. Learning and generalization of a two-dimensional sameness-difference concept by chimpanzees and orangutans. King JE J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1973 Jul; 84(1):140-8. PubMed ID: 4717546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Transfer of a learned form discrimination in the infant and adult monkey. Zimmermann RR Dev Psychobiol; 1970; 3(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 5005725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Spontaneous transfer of matching by infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Oden DL; Thompson RK; Premack D J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1988 Apr; 14(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 3367100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed reward contingency task II: transfer to new quantities, long-term retention, and the impact of quantity ratios. Uher J; Call J J Comp Psychol; 2008 May; 122(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 18489236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dimensional preference, pretraining, and attention in children's concept identification. Rollins H; Castle K Child Dev; 1973 Jun; 44(2):363-6. PubMed ID: 4705563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. SUCCESSIVE DISCRIMINATION-REVERSAL TRAINING AND MULTIPLE DISCRIMINATION TRAINING IN ONE-TRIAL LEARNING BY CHIMPANZEES. SCHUSTERMAN RJ J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1964 Aug; 58():153-6. PubMed ID: 14197033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Strength of dimensional preferences as a predictor of nursery-school children's performance on a concept-shift task. Seitz V; Weir MW J Exp Child Psychol; 1971 Dec; 12(3):370-86. PubMed ID: 5126235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Asymmetrical stimulus control and the mirror-image problem. Clarke JC; Whitehurst GJ J Exp Child Psychol; 1974 Feb; 17(1):147-66. PubMed ID: 4816644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Absence of knowledge attribution and self-recognition in young chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Povinelli DJ; Rulf AB; Bierschwale DT J Comp Psychol; 1994 Mar; 108(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 8174347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Piagetian conservation of discrete quantities in bonobos (Pan paniscus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Suda C; Call J Anim Cogn; 2005 Oct; 8(4):220-35. PubMed ID: 15692813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ability of chimpanzees to respond to symbols of quantity in comparison with that of children and of monkeys. Brown DP; Lenneberg EH; Ettlinger G J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1978 Oct; 92(5):815-20. PubMed ID: 569665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Information integration about object-object relationships by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Tanaka M J Comp Psychol; 1996 Dec; 110(4):323-35. PubMed ID: 9011410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of labels and cues in children's concept identification. Scholnick EK Child Dev; 1971 Dec; 42(6):1849-58. PubMed ID: 5146020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The performance of bonobos (Pan paniscus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) in two versions of an object-choice task. Mulcahy NJ; Call J J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):304-9. PubMed ID: 19685972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Generality of perceptual biases in inference and concept usage. Scholnick EK Child Dev; 1971 Dec; 42(6):1937-49. PubMed ID: 5146023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. How young children and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) perceive objects in a 2D display: putting an assumption to the test. Leighty KA; Menzel CR; Fragaszy DM Dev Sci; 2008 Sep; 11(5):778-92. PubMed ID: 18801134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Applications of Hull-Spence theory to the transfer of discrimination learning in children. Spiker CC; Cantor JH Adv Child Dev Behav; 1973; 8():223-88. PubMed ID: 4782254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]