These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4718901)
1. The crisis of the peer review system. Lepow IH Fed Proc; 1973 Aug; 32(8):1827. PubMed ID: 4718901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Is peer review in crisis? Mulligan A Oral Oncol; 2005 Feb; 41(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 15695114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Research funding and the peer review system. Apirion D Fed Proc; 1979 Dec; 38(13):2649-50. PubMed ID: 510555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The peer review system on trial. Bowers R Am Sci; 1975; 63(6):624-6. PubMed ID: 1200477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [The peer review system inhibits creative research. Let the scientists take care of the "risk capital"]. Dahlgren C Lakartidningen; 1993 Nov; 90(44):3829-30. PubMed ID: 8231530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Peer review and scientific method in clinical research. Morgan PP Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Feb; 124(3):251-3. PubMed ID: 7459784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Letter: Peer review system utilized by the NIH and the NSF. Fed Proc; 1973 Dec; 32(12):2142-3. PubMed ID: 4753768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Proposals for improving the Peer Review System of the National Institutes of Health. Kirschstein RL Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 10304717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The peer review system. Homburger F Fed Proc; 1980 May; 39(7):2349-50. PubMed ID: 7371871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The peer review system. Paque RE Fed Proc; 1980 May; 39(7):2350-1. PubMed ID: 7371872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Proposals, peer review, and research results. Roy R Science; 1979 Jun; 204(4398):1154, 1156-7. PubMed ID: 451561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. NIH and the scientist--and a crisis of apathy. Waitzman MB Fed Proc; 1974 Jun; 33(6):1677-8. PubMed ID: 4827512 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review: inter-reviewer agreement during evaluation of research grant applications. Wiener SL; Urivetzky M; Bregman D; Cohen J; Eich R; Gootman N; Gulotta S; Taylor B; Tuttle R; Webb W; Wright J Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):306-11. PubMed ID: 10304719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Peer review in request for subsidy]. Monnens LA Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1997 Aug; 141(32):1581-2. PubMed ID: 9543756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Peer review is a two-way process. Grant D Nature; 1997 Aug; 388(6645):822. PubMed ID: 9278037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Peer review is a two-way process. Fielder A; Vinyard H Nature; 1997 Aug; 388(6645):822. PubMed ID: 9278036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Peer review when applying for a subsidy]. Klasen EC Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1997 Jun; 141(23):1161-2. PubMed ID: 9380149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Unresolved issues relating to peer review, industry support of research, and conflict of interest. Saidman LJ Anesthesiology; 1994 Mar; 80(3):491-2. PubMed ID: 8141444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]