These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4719358)

  • 1. A cochlear prosthesis: further clinical observations; preliminary results of physiological studies.
    Michelson RP; Merzenich MM; Pettit CR; Schindler RA
    Laryngoscope; 1973 Jul; 83(7):1116-22. PubMed ID: 4719358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man.
    Eddington DK; Dobelle WH; Brackmann DE; Mladejovsky MG; Parkin JL
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1978; 87(6 Pt 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 736424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Electric stimulation of the cochlea].
    Bogomil'skiĭ MR
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1976; (6):81-5. PubMed ID: 798401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural encoding of sound sensation evoked by electrical stimulation of the acoustic nerve.
    Merzenich MM; Michelson RP; Pettit CR; Schindler RA; Reid M
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1973; 82(4):486-503. PubMed ID: 4721185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multichannel cochlear implants.
    Michelson RP
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1978 Feb; 11(1):209-16. PubMed ID: 662348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Model of an endocochlear multicanal implant. Results].
    Bosch J; Prades J; Colomina R; Monferré A
    An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am; 1978; 5(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 727409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychoacoustic evaluation of present prostheses.
    Bilger RC
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 3 Suppl 38):92-104. PubMed ID: 405915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implanted auditory prosthesis: an evaluation of subjects presently fitted with cochlear implants.
    Bilger RC; Black FO; Hopkinson NT; Myers EN
    Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1977; 84(4 Pt 1):ORL-677-82. PubMed ID: 898520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Further progress in the development of multichannel cochlear implants.
    Merzenich MM; White MW; Leake PA; Schindler RA; Michelson RP
    Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1977; 84(2):181-2. PubMed ID: 898495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Results of partial deafness cochlear implantation using various electrode designs.
    Skarzyński H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Podskarbi-Fayette R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():39-45. PubMed ID: 19390174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory prostheses in perspective.
    Bilger RC; Black FO
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 2 Suppl 38):3-10. PubMed ID: 405908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audiologic outcomes with the penetrating electrode auditory brainstem implant.
    Otto SR; Shannon RV; Wilkinson EP; Hitselberger WE; McCreery DB; Moore JK; Brackmann DE
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1147-54. PubMed ID: 18931643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Electrical stimulation of hearing in humans: a survey of the actual state of development of an implantable prosthesis for sensorineural deafness (author's transl)].
    Dillier N; Spillmann T
    HNO; 1978 Mar; 26(3):77-84. PubMed ID: 640868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and evaluation of an improved cochlear implant electrode design for electric acoustic stimulation.
    Adunka O; Kiefer J; Unkelbach MH; Lehnert T; Gstoettner W
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jul; 114(7):1237-41. PubMed ID: 15235353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of monaural acoustic and electric stimulation: unit types in the cat inferior colliculus.
    Lithgow BJ; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():118-21. PubMed ID: 7668599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pitch matching of electric and acoustic stimuli.
    Blamey PJ; Parisi ES; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():220-2. PubMed ID: 7668645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electro-acoustic stimulation. Acoustic and electric pitch comparisons.
    McDermott H; Sucher C; Simpson A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():2-7. PubMed ID: 19390169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The clinical value of single electrode systems in auditory prostheses.
    House WF
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1978 Feb; 11(1):201-8. PubMed ID: 662347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrical stimulation of the human cochlea and the flexible multichannel intracochlear electrode.
    Jako GJ
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1978 Feb; 11(1):235-40. PubMed ID: 662350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Present status and future directions of the Ear Research Institute cochlear implant program.
    House WF; Berliner KI; Eisenberg LS
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1979; 87(3-4):176-84. PubMed ID: 442997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.