These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4719358)

  • 41. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Neurophysiological requirements for implanted cochlear prostheses.
    Keidel WD
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1979; 87(3-4):163-9. PubMed ID: 442995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A new method of partial deafness treatment.
    Skarzyński H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A
    Med Sci Monit; 2003 Apr; 9(4):CS20-4. PubMed ID: 12709676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effects of the auditory prosthesis on postural stability.
    Black FO
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 2 Suppl 38):141-64. PubMed ID: 405904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A new approach to the cochlear implant.
    Douek E
    Proc R Soc Med; 1977 Jun; 70(6):379-83. PubMed ID: 877107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Selective activation of cat primary auditory cortex by way of direct intraneural auditory nerve stimulation.
    Kim SJ; Badi AN; Normann RA
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Jun; 117(6):1053-62. PubMed ID: 17545868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: a histologically controlled insertion study.
    Adunka O; Unkelbach MH; Mack M; Hambek M; Gstoettner W; Kiefer J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 124(7):807-12. PubMed ID: 15370564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Ineraid cochlear implant in the ossified cochlea: surgical techniques and results.
    Montandon PB; Boëx C; Pelizzone M
    Am J Otol; 1994 Nov; 15(6):748-51. PubMed ID: 8572086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [First observations of a cochlear-implant operation (author's transl)].
    Banfai P; Hortmann G; Wustrow F
    HNO; 1978 Nov; 26(11):377-80. PubMed ID: 721634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A hearing prosthesis for severe perceptive deafness--experimental studies.
    Clark GM
    J Laryngol Otol; 1973 Oct; 87(10):929-45. PubMed ID: 4593743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Rehabilitation of hearing-impaired patients with cochlear implants: a review].
    Gstoettner W; Adunka O; Hamzavi J; Baumgartner WD
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):464-72. PubMed ID: 10890122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Deep electrode insertion in cochlear implants: apical morphology, electrodes and speech perception results.
    Hochmair I; Arnold W; Nopp P; Jolly C; Müller J; Roland P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Jun; 123(5):612-7. PubMed ID: 12875584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cochlear implant: new hope for the totally deaf.
    Bailey HA; Pappas JJ; Graham SS
    J Ark Med Soc; 1982 Jul; 79(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 6214542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of two frequency-to-electrode maps for acoustic-electric stimulation.
    Simpson A; McDermott HJ; Dowell RC; Sucher C; Briggs RJ
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Feb; 48(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 19219690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Extracochlear prosthesis in acute experiment].
    Bogomil'skiĭ MR; D"iakonova IN; Tikhomirov AM; Fitenko LN
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1992; (2):22-4. PubMed ID: 1632030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A functioning multichannel auditory nerve stimulator. A preliminary report on two human volunteers.
    Simmons FB; Mathews RG; Walker MG; White RL
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1979; 87(3-4):170-5. PubMed ID: 442996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve and auditory prostheses: a review of the literature.
    Bilger RC
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 2 Suppl 38):11-20. PubMed ID: 405903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effect of sensorineural lesions on pitch discrimination in cats.
    ELLIOTT DN
    Trans Am Otol Soc; 1961; 49():139-56. PubMed ID: 13889939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cochlear implants.
    Lancet; 1982 Jan; 1(8262):28. PubMed ID: 6119419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Present audiologic status of subjects implanted with auditory prostheses.
    Hopkinson NT; Bilger RC; Black FO
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 3 Suppl 38):40-8. PubMed ID: 405909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.