85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4721525)
1. Surgical pros and cons.
Hall RC; Devitt JE
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1973 Sep; 137(3):482-3. PubMed ID: 4721525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Complications of T-drainage after choledochotomy].
Gigon A; Middendorp UG
Helv Chir Acta; 1993 Mar; 59(4):705-6. PubMed ID: 8473196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The T-tube.
JAMA; 1973 Aug; 225(9):1120. PubMed ID: 4740620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Bile T-drain connection as a closed system].
Nahrstedt U; Rückert K; Niebuhr H
Chirurg; 1991 Feb; 62(2):152-3. PubMed ID: 2044425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comment on the contribution by K. A. Lennert and U. Müller: How great is the risk of surgical treatment of choledocholithiasis?].
Eigler FW; Walz M
Chirurg; 1990 Oct; 61(10):739. PubMed ID: 2276307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct with primary closure versus T-tube drainage: a randomized clinical trial.
Zhang WJ; Xu GF; Wu GZ; Li JM; Dong ZT; Mo XD
J Surg Res; 2009 Nov; 157(1):e1-5. PubMed ID: 19577251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sump syndrome and biliary adenocarcinoma 40 years after surgical choledochoduodenal fistula.
Mecklenburg I; Scheubel R; Messmann H
Endoscopy; 2007 Feb; 39 Suppl 1():E194. PubMed ID: 17614061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [A combined T-shaped drain-obturator].
Manevich VL; Upyrev AV; El'kina IA; Gusev EIu
Khirurgiia (Mosk); 1988 Apr; (4):132-4. PubMed ID: 3398401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy for common bile duct stones.
Ha JP; Tang CN; Siu WT; Chau CH; Li MK
Hepatogastroenterology; 2004; 51(60):1605-8. PubMed ID: 15532787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [External choledochoduodenostomy in the surgical treatment of choledocholithiasis].
Eisert A; Petri I; Bodnár A
Zentralbl Chir; 1974 Jun; 99(26):812-7. PubMed ID: 4848734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Complications of T tube drainage. Four observations (author's transl)].
Michotey G; Signouret B; Argeme M; Ages M
Ann Chir; 1981 May; 35(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 7247312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Surgical treatment of acute cholecystitis and coexistent lithiasis of bile ducts].
Sierko S; Dowgird A; Bernacki E
Pol Przegl Chir; 1968 Nov; 40(11):1342-7. PubMed ID: 5701027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Antegrade biliary stenting versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy--a comparative cohort study.
Tang CN; Tai CK; Ha JP; Tsui KK; Wong DC; Li MK
Hepatogastroenterology; 2006; 53(69):330-4. PubMed ID: 16795965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spilled gallstones cannot be ignored.
Woodfield JR; Windsor JA
Am J Surg; 2006 Aug; 192(2):270-1. PubMed ID: 16860647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Lithiasis of the main bile duct: change in surgical approach].
Boymond P; Rohner A
Helv Chir Acta; 1980 Dec; 47(5):593-5. PubMed ID: 7204082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Premature removal of the Kehr drain after choledocotomy for lithiasis].
Reymond JC
Nouv Presse Med; 1977 Sep; 6(30):2692-3. PubMed ID: 909764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Surgical therapy of gastro-duodenal ulcer: the pros and cons of vagotomy].
Pietri P
Minerva Med; 1972; 63(48 Suppl):5-9. PubMed ID: 5049188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Infective complications after choledochotomy. Incidence after T-tube drainage of the common bile duct or after choledochoduodenostomy.
Lygidakis NJ
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1982 Jul; 27(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 7131363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. More on T-tubes.
Carter AE
JAMA; 1973 Oct; 226(2):197. PubMed ID: 4740917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Retrospective study of a series of 240 cases of common bile duct lithiasis].
Leborgne J; Rivière J; Le Neel JC; Amin M; Malvy P
Ann Chir; 1983 Jun; 37(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 6614799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
