These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4722993)

  • 1. The patient's right to refuse.
    Epstein RL; Benson DJ
    Hospitals; 1973 Aug; 47(16):38-41. PubMed ID: 4722993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The "Witnesses" could win.
    Spencer JD
    Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1978 Jun; 6(6):45-9. PubMed ID: 661475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mercy Hospital, Inc. v. Jackson: a recurring dilemma for health care providers in the treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses.
    Bamberger DH
    MD Law Rev; 1987; 46(3):514-32. PubMed ID: 11649934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusion.
    Dixon JL
    Conn Med; 1975 Jul; 39(7):433-7. PubMed ID: 1157495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusion: the horns of a dilemma.
    Dornette WH
    Anesth Analg; 1973 Mar; 52(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 4735293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blood transfusions and Jehovah's Witnesses. The impact of the patient's unusual beliefs in critical care.
    Jonsen AR
    Crit Care Clin; 1986 Jan; 2(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 3331309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compulsory medical treatment and a patient's free exercise of religion.
    Med Leg Bull; 1975 Mar; 24(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 1094258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What to do when a patient refuses treatment.
    Drake K
    Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1979 Oct; 7(10):22-7. PubMed ID: 263188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The right of a patient to refuse blood transfusions: a dilemma of conscience and law for patient, physician and hospital.
    Silbermann BD
    Univ San Fernando Valley Law Review; 1974; 3(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 11664351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Compulsory medical treatment and religious freedom: whose law shall prevail?
    Paris JJ
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 11661287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Save the body, lose the soul. Catholic healthcare professionals should respect Jehovah's Witnesses' right to refuse a transfusion.
    Devine RJ
    Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):68-72. PubMed ID: 10293333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Giving blood to the critically ill newborn of Jehovah's Witness parents: the human side of the issue.
    Benfield DG
    Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1978 Jun; 6(6):33-6. PubMed ID: 566364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Praying for relief from parens patriae: should a child be allowed to refuse life-saving medical treatment on religious grounds?
    Kessler DN
    Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):673-93. PubMed ID: 11650888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Malette v. Shulman: the requirement of consent in medical emergencies.
    Siebrasse N
    McGill Law J; 1989; 34(4):1080-98. PubMed ID: 11659256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The right to refuse treatment and blood transfusion.
    Csapody T
    Bull Med Ethics; 2001 Feb; (165):13-6. PubMed ID: 11831259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forced medication: by whose right?
    Paris JJ
    America (NY); 1975 Nov; 133(15):323-5. PubMed ID: 11664563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The jurisprudence about blood transfusion and informed consent of Jehovah witnesses].
    Figueroa G R
    Rev Med Chil; 2018 Jul; 146(7):914-917. PubMed ID: 30534892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Childhood cancer and the Jehovah's Witness faith.
    Frankel LS; Damme CJ; Eys JV
    Pediatrics; 1977 Dec; 60(6):916-21. PubMed ID: 600607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In re E.G., a Minor: death over life: a judicial trend continues as the Illinois Supreme Court grants minors the right to refuse life-saving medical treatment.
    Brewster WD
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):771-86. PubMed ID: 16622959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stamford Hospital v. Vega.
    Connecticut. Supreme Court
    Atl Report; 1996 Apr; 674():821-34. PubMed ID: 11648307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.