141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4724400)
1. [Abortion in the United States. Decisions of the Supreme Court].
Veylon R
Nouv Presse Med; 1973 Jul; 2(29):1952-4. PubMed ID: 4724400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
Goldman EB
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
Brown HO
Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right?
Barber RA
Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Webster versus reproductive health services.
Rhodes AM
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(6):423. PubMed ID: 2514333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion counseling: to benefit maternal health.
Steinberg TN
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):483-517. PubMed ID: 2699161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed, again.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Oct; 16(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 3771197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Rehnquistean bed: the abortion issue revisited.
Maher VF; Badin R
J N Y State Nurses Assoc; 1990 Dec; 21(4):4-5. PubMed ID: 2269898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Roe v. Wade and the history of abortion regulation.
Linton PB
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):227-33. PubMed ID: 2690604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Potential constitutional issues raised by the proposed amendments to the Georgia abortion statute.
Berg RN
J Med Assoc Ga; 1982 Feb; 71(2):128-31. PubMed ID: 7077199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion 1982: the Supreme Court once again.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1982 Nov; 46(11):681. PubMed ID: 7172671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An abortion perspective: legal considerations.
Lyon FA
Minn Med; 1980 Sep; 63(9):659-61. PubMed ID: 7219400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. U.S. Supreme Court on abortion. Roe v. Wade, 41 U.S.L.W. 4213(1973).
Conn Med; 1973 Jun; 37(6):279-89. PubMed ID: 4706076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion on demand.
Rovinsky JJ
Mt Sinai J Med; 1984; 51(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 6608671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion ethics.
Fromer MJ
Nurs Outlook; 1982 Apr; 30(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 7041095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bare court majority reaffirms Roe, but standard for reviewing state laws is relaxed.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Jul; (11):1-3. PubMed ID: 12286280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Legal abortion: the impending obsolescence of the trimester framework.
Mangel CP
Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(1):69-108. PubMed ID: 3068986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion: 2. Fetal status and legal representation.
Dickens BM
Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Feb; 124(3):253-4. PubMed ID: 7459785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
Sayeed SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Court edges away from Roe v. Wade.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1989; 21(4):184-7. PubMed ID: 2792338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
