These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4724400)
21. Teenage abortion in Germany: with reference to the legal system in the United States. Belling DW; Eberl C J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):475-502. PubMed ID: 8666732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Abortion and the law: the Supreme Court, privacy, and abortion. Marsh FH Adv Bioeth; 1997; 2():107-23. PubMed ID: 12348324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law. Denniston L Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions. Haas-Wilson D J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Is there life after Roe v. Wade? Mahowald MB Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):22-9. PubMed ID: 2663777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ethical issues in U.S. family planning policy. Benshoof J Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):11-2. PubMed ID: 12338973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights. Chopko ME Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The legal status of abortion in the states if Roe v. Wade is overruled. Linton PB Issues Law Med; 2007; 23(1):3-43. PubMed ID: 17703698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The abortion arena: recent activity. Goldstein LS; Comeau DJ Leg Med; 1982; ():213-26. PubMed ID: 7121180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Medicine and the law: treatment of minors--consent requirements. Young MG Tex Med; 1983 Jan; 79(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 6687501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The fight over Roe v. Wade: the Webster briefs. Fam Plann Perspect; 1989; 21(3):134-6. PubMed ID: 2759219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Right to abortion: the courts versus the legislatures. Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1980 Jan; 54(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 6985600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries. Smolin DM Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The minor's right of privacy: limitations on state action after Danforth and Carey. Siliciano JA Columbia Law Rev; 1977 Dec; 77(8):1216-46. PubMed ID: 10273154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. High court gives states more freedom to require consent in teen abortions. Denniston L Sun; 1993 Nov; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12345223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Abortion and the search for public policy. McIntyre RL Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1993; 8(3):7-16. PubMed ID: 8118140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Supreme Court and abortion: 2. Sidestepping social realities. Mechanic D Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):17-9. PubMed ID: 7007284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reproductive rights in jeopardy. The Supreme Court upholds restrictions on abortion. Gleeson K ZPG Report; 1992 Sep; 24(4):7. PubMed ID: 12317715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Beyond abortion: the potential reach of a human life amendment. Westfall D Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(2):97-135. PubMed ID: 7148834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]