These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4724409)
1. Evaluation of selection tendencies of patients preferring prepared childbirth. Leonard RF Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Sep; 42(3):371-7. PubMed ID: 4724409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of pregnancy planning status on birth outcomes and infant care. Kost K; Landry DJ; Darroch JE Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(5):223-30. PubMed ID: 9782045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reaction of unmarried girls to pregnancy. Claman AD; Williams BJ; Wogan L Can Med Assoc J; 1969 Sep; 101(6):328-34. PubMed ID: 5822465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Recent changes in expected family size: some panel results from Rhode Island. Rao SL Stud Fam Plann; 1973 Mar; 4(3):70-2. PubMed ID: 4699865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Can we believe recent data on birth expectations in the United States? Blake J Demography; 1974 Feb; 11(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 4813037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Effect of social and biological factors on family size and the secondary sex ratio in 2 human generations in Monterey, Nueva León]. Garza Chapa R; Riojas Valdés VM; Jiménez Contreras JA; Cerda Flores RM Salud Publica Mex; 1986; 28(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 3961587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [A survey on the use of contraceptives by adolescents]. Requillart MA Rev Fr Sociol; 1983; 24(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 12266242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differential fertility in a rural area of East Pakistan. Stoeckel J; Choudhury MA Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1969 Apr; 47(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 5787924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ghana: the attitudes of urban males toward family size and family limitation. Pool DI Stud Fam Plann; 1970 Dec; 60():12-7. PubMed ID: 5521303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Polling Americans on birth control and population. Lipson G; Wolman D Fam Plann Perspect; 1972 Jan; 4(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 5020857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors influencing women's decision to have a home birth in rural Turkey. Kukulu K; Oncel S Midwifery; 2009 Feb; 25(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 17368665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Demographic and social characteristics of family planning acceptors in Jordan. Sahawneh F Popul Bull ECWA; 1982; (22-23):119-36. PubMed ID: 12266313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Professional support is of great importance in breast feeding]. Haasnoot-Smallegange RM; Renders CM; Oudesluys-Murphy AM; Hirasing RA Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009 Mar; 153(10):434-9. PubMed ID: 19374092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The health of mothers and children: key issues in developing countries. World Health Organization WHO In Point Fact; 1990 Sep; (70):1-4. PubMed ID: 12285077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Family planning patterns in Sierra Leone. Dow TE Stud Fam Plann; 1971 Oct; 2(10):211-22. PubMed ID: 5164356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Breast feeding today. A statistical study in the city of Genoa]. Minetti C; Zoppi G; Conforti G; Venzano V Minerva Pediatr; 1980 Apr; 32(8):543-6. PubMed ID: 7393186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Opposing effects of maternal and paternal socioeconomic status on neonatal feeding method, place of sleep, and maternal sleep time. Glenn LL; Quillin SI J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2007; 21(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 17505238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]