These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4727264)

  • 1. Determination of small mass differences in roentgenography. 3. Experimental investigations with a dental roentgen apparatus.
    Lysell G
    Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol; 1973 Apr; 12(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 4727264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of small mass differences in roentgenography. II. Experimental investigations with a roentgen diffraction apparatus.
    Hollender L; Lysell G
    Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol; 1972 Apr; 11(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 5038624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of lead foil in dental X-ray film packets. 2. The effect of back-scattered radiation on radiographic contrast when the density is maintained at an optimum level.
    Price C
    Br Dent J; 1972 Oct; 133(8):343-6. PubMed ID: 4510027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of BID length and shape on the surface area and volume of tissue exposed during dental radiography.
    Hardman PK; Masood F
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Feb; 6(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 15719072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of radiation doses received during examinations with the pantomograph, orthopantomograph, Panorex, Status-X and conventional roentgen apparatus.
    Altonen M; Heikkilä M; Mattila K
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1974 Apr; 70(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 4831509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimum photon energy in ordinary radiography of the larynx.
    Hemmingsson A; Lundqvist H
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1972 May; 12(3):305-16. PubMed ID: 5045425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast formation in fluoroscopic videodensitometry. I. A mathematical model for optimising contrast in radiography.
    Strid KG; Lantz B
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1973 Jul; 14(4):395-406. PubMed ID: 4748169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reduction of patient exposure during dental radiography.
    Bushong SC; Galbreath JC; Garris R; Merritt E
    Health Phys; 1971 Aug; 21(2):281-4. PubMed ID: 5094197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of collimator size of a dental X-ray unit on image contrast.
    Falk A; Lindhe JE; Rohlin M; Nilsson M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Sep; 28(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 10490742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A method of determining the sensitometric properties of non-screen x-ray films.
    Price C
    Br J Radiol; 1973 Sep; 46(549):719-23. PubMed ID: 4733243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Control of scattered radiation by air gap techniques: applications to chest radiography.
    Gould RG; Hale J
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1974 Sep; 122(1):109-18. PubMed ID: 4423928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of aluminium to simulate attenuation in diagnostic roentgen beams.
    Gould RG; Hale J
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1973 Mar; 14(2):193-5. PubMed ID: 4727259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Dose distribution of scattered X-rays in dental roentgenography].
    Fujita M; Yasutomi Y; Tomita S; Ogawa M; Sunayashiki T; Wada T; Nakano A; Tomura M
    Hiroshima Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1987 Dec; 19(2):424-8. PubMed ID: 3504877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contamination of dental radiographic solutions.
    Tamburus JR; Pardini LC; Watanabe PC
    Braz Dent J; 1995; 6(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 8688649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Degradation of dental radiographic processing solutions.
    Brown CE; Winkworth RJ; Anderson OV; Jerman AC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1973 Nov; 87(6):1200-5. PubMed ID: 4521579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic radiography: analysis of dynamics using secondary radiation.
    Miller KL; Kenney ES; Jabobs AM; Weidner WA; Tilley DG
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1974 Sep; 35(9):519-24. PubMed ID: 4412872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity.
    Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soft tissue intensification in frontal roentgenography of the larynx.
    Hemmingsson A; Jung B; Lundqvist H
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1972 Sep; 12(5):593-603. PubMed ID: 4564630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Geometric blur and distribution of intensity in a roentgen picture field].
    Elsass A; Fenner E; Friedel R; Schnitger H
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1971 Dec; 115(6):822-7. PubMed ID: 5167735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Transmission quality of radiograph amplifiers and their significance in quantitative radiologic density measurement].
    Bürsch J
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1972; ():Suppl:141-2. PubMed ID: 4341174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.