273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4739656)
1. Comparability of the American Cancer Society and National Institutes of Health peer review systems.
Vivona S; Do van Quy D
Cancer Res; 1973 Apr; 33(4):919. PubMed ID: 4739656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review of research project grants by NIH study sections: report of the Committee on National Medical Policy, American Society for Clinical Investigation.
Bondurant S
Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 10304718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer review of researchgrant applications at the National Institutes of Health 2: review by an initial review group.
Henley C
Fed Proc; 1977 Aug; 36(9):2186-90. PubMed ID: 885260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 1: the assignment and referral processes.
Henley C
Fed Proc; 1977 Jul; 36(8):2066-8. PubMed ID: 872944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Trends in the support of cancer research in the United States.
Endicott KM
Proc Can Cancer Conf; 1969; 8():1-8. PubMed ID: 4893427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Committee on Growth, 1945-1956: another noble experiment.
Shimkin MB
Cancer Res; 1979 Jan; 39(1):262-8. PubMed ID: 367579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The National Cancer Act of 1971 with changes made by the National Cancer Act Amendments of 1974.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1977 Aug; 59(2 Suppl):701-7. PubMed ID: 886628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Proposals for improving the Peer Review System of the National Institutes of Health.
Kirschstein RL
Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 10304717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 3: review by an advisory board/council.
Henley C
Fed Proc; 1977 Sep; 36(10):2335-8. PubMed ID: 892000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Letter: The National Institutes of Health grants peer review study team.
Looney GL
Am J Chin Med (Gard City N Y); 1976; 4(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 937242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying?
Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Feb; 16(2):238. PubMed ID: 18284879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. NSF probes peer review; NIH investigates awards.
Change; 1976 Feb; 8(1):60-1. PubMed ID: 1030336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Management operations of the National Cancer Institute that influence the governance of science.
Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1984 May; 64():1-139. PubMed ID: 6749243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Remembering the peer in peer review.
O'Connell KA
Nurs Res; 1987; 36(6):379-80. PubMed ID: 3671127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Urologic cancer research at the National Cancer Institute.
Chiarodo A
Semin Urol; 1993 Feb; 11(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 8465123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cancer fraud case stuns research community, prompts reflection on peer review process.
Vastag B
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Mar; 98(6):374-6. PubMed ID: 16537825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Moron peer review.
Brenner S
Curr Biol; 1999 Oct; 9(20):R755. PubMed ID: 10531042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Editorial: The Peer Review System and NIH.
Bucy PC
Surg Neurol; 1976 May; 5(5):319-20. PubMed ID: 1265652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review reviewed.
Mehl JW
Fed Proc; 1975 Aug; 34(9):i-iv. PubMed ID: 1149887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The peer review system.
Paque RE
Fed Proc; 1980 May; 39(7):2350-1. PubMed ID: 7371872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
