These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4739656)
1. Comparability of the American Cancer Society and National Institutes of Health peer review systems. Vivona S; Do van Quy D Cancer Res; 1973 Apr; 33(4):919. PubMed ID: 4739656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review of research project grants by NIH study sections: report of the Committee on National Medical Policy, American Society for Clinical Investigation. Bondurant S Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 10304718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer review of researchgrant applications at the National Institutes of Health 2: review by an initial review group. Henley C Fed Proc; 1977 Aug; 36(9):2186-90. PubMed ID: 885260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 1: the assignment and referral processes. Henley C Fed Proc; 1977 Jul; 36(8):2066-8. PubMed ID: 872944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Trends in the support of cancer research in the United States. Endicott KM Proc Can Cancer Conf; 1969; 8():1-8. PubMed ID: 4893427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Committee on Growth, 1945-1956: another noble experiment. Shimkin MB Cancer Res; 1979 Jan; 39(1):262-8. PubMed ID: 367579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The National Cancer Act of 1971 with changes made by the National Cancer Act Amendments of 1974. J Natl Cancer Inst; 1977 Aug; 59(2 Suppl):701-7. PubMed ID: 886628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Proposals for improving the Peer Review System of the National Institutes of Health. Kirschstein RL Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 10304717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 3: review by an advisory board/council. Henley C Fed Proc; 1977 Sep; 36(10):2335-8. PubMed ID: 892000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Letter: The National Institutes of Health grants peer review study team. Looney GL Am J Chin Med (Gard City N Y); 1976; 4(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 937242 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying? Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Feb; 16(2):238. PubMed ID: 18284879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Management operations of the National Cancer Institute that influence the governance of science. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1984 May; 64():1-139. PubMed ID: 6749243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Remembering the peer in peer review. O'Connell KA Nurs Res; 1987; 36(6):379-80. PubMed ID: 3671127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Urologic cancer research at the National Cancer Institute. Chiarodo A Semin Urol; 1993 Feb; 11(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 8465123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cancer fraud case stuns research community, prompts reflection on peer review process. Vastag B J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Mar; 98(6):374-6. PubMed ID: 16537825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]