These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4742050)

  • 1. Contact sensitivity in the mouse. XII. The use of DNA synthesis in vivo to determine the anatomical location of immunological unresponsiveness to picryl chloride.
    Asherson GL; Barnes RM
    Immunology; 1973 Sep; 25(3):495-508. PubMed ID: 4742050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contact sensitivity in the mouse. IX. The role of immunological and non-immunological inflammation in the movement of lymphocytes to immunized lymph nodes.
    Asherson GL; Barnes RM
    Immunology; 1973 May; 24(5):885-94. PubMed ID: 4715261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The mechanism of immunological unresponsiveness to picryl chloride and the possible role of antibody mediated depression.
    Asherson GL; Zembala M; Barnes RM
    Clin Exp Immunol; 1971 Jul; 9(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 4934398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DNA synthesis in vitro during contact sensitivity in the mouse.
    Barnes RM
    Eur J Immunol; 1973 Oct; 3(10):605-8. PubMed ID: 4128809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Suppressor cells for the afferent phase of contact sensitivity to picryl chloride: inhibition of DNA synthesis induced by T cells from mice injected with picryl sulfonic acid.
    Thomas WR; Watkins MC; Asherson GL
    J Immunol; 1979 Jun; 122(6):2300-3. PubMed ID: 87459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proceedings: Control mechanisms in cell-mediated immunity. The separate control of net DNA synthesis and of contact sensitivity skin reactions and the role of thymus-derived cells.
    Asherson GL; Zembala M; Wood PJ
    Monogr Allergy; 1974; 8(0):154-67. PubMed ID: 4546001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissociation between lymph node and peripheral reactivity in immunological unresponsiveness to DNCB.
    Polak L; Frey JR; Turk JL
    Immunology; 1973 Sep; 25(3):451-7. PubMed ID: 4742049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFB in mice. II. Specific in vitro stimulation with a hapten, 2,4-dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (DNB-SO3Na).
    Phanuphak P; Moorhead JW; Claman HN
    J Immunol; 1974 Feb; 112(2):849-51. PubMed ID: 4813906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cell transfer studies on the persistence of homograft sensitivity in the mouse: in vitro and in vivo correlates of the activity of sensitised lymph node cells.
    Warren J; Gowland G
    J Pathol; 1974 Oct; 114(2):101-11. PubMed ID: 4613807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suppression of contact sensitivity by T cells in the mouse. I. Demonstration that suppressor cells act on the effector stage of contact sensitivity; and their induction following in vitro exposure to antigen.
    Asherson GL; Zembala M
    Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1974 Nov; 187(1088):329-48. PubMed ID: 4154454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contact sensitivity in the germ-free mouse.
    MacDonald TT; Carter PB
    J Reticuloendothel Soc; 1978 Sep; 24(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 731633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. IL-12 as mediator and adjuvant for the induction of contact sensitivity in vivo.
    Müller G; Saloga J; Germann T; Schuler G; Knop J; Enk AH
    J Immunol; 1995 Nov; 155(10):4661-8. PubMed ID: 7594465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of adult thymectomy on the contact sensitivity skin reaction and the unresponsiveness caused by feeding contact sensitizing agents.
    Perera MA; Asherson GL
    Immunology; 1981 Aug; 43(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 7275168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immunogenic cells in the regional lymph nodes after painting with the contact sensitizers picryl chloride and oxazolone: evidence for the presence of IgM antibody on their surface.
    Asherson GL; Colizzi V; Watkins MC
    Immunology; 1983 Mar; 48(3):561-9. PubMed ID: 6826205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo activity of interleukin-2: conversion of a stimulus causing unresponsiveness to a stimulus causing contact hypersensitivity by the injection of interleukin-2.
    Colizzi V; Malkovsky M; Lang G; Asherson GL
    Immunology; 1985 Dec; 56(4):653-8. PubMed ID: 3878326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Production of immunity and unresponsiveness in the mouse by feeding contact sensitizing agents and the role of suppressor cells in the peyer's patches, mesenteric lymph nodes and other lymphoid tissues.
    Asherson GL; Zembala M; Perera MA; Mayhew B; Thomas WR
    Cell Immunol; 1977 Sep; 33(1):145-55. PubMed ID: 302759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contact sensitivity in the mouse. XI. Movement of T blasts in the draining lymph nodes to sites of inflammation.
    Asherson GL; Allwood GG; Mayhew B
    Immunology; 1973 Sep; 25(3):485-94. PubMed ID: 4542648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Control of the immune reaction: T cells in immunized mice which depress the in vivo DNA synthesis response in the lymph nodes to skin painting with the contact sensitizing agent picryl chloride.
    Wood P; Asherson GL; Mayhew B; Thomas WR; Zembala M
    Cell Immunol; 1977 Apr; 30(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 324643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in the ability of T cells to suppress the induction and expression of contact sensitivity.
    Thomas WR; Watkins MC; Asherson GL
    Immunology; 1981 Jan; 42(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 6450730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Classification of immunological unresponsiveness and tolerance.
    Asherson GL; Barnes RM
    Proc R Soc Med; 1973 May; 66(5):468-71. PubMed ID: 4577344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.