These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4742381)

  • 1. The psychological refractory period and the effect of stimulus discriminability.
    Tolkmitt FJ; Lunn SE
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 86(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 4742381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of stimulus discriminability on psychological refractory period effect.
    Tolkmitt FJ; O'Connor GP
    Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Oct; 33(2):571-4. PubMed ID: 5124115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus intensity and foreperiod effects in intersensory facilitation.
    Bernstein IH; Chu PK; Briggs P; Schurman DL
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1973 May; 25(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 4515814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A study of the phases of audiovisual interaction].
    Bagdonas A; Shiautkulis A
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1975; 25(5):908-15. PubMed ID: 1210755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual and simultaneous tracking of a step input by the horizontal saccadic eye movement and manual control systems.
    Megaw ED; Armstrong W
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Sep; 100(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 4744495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The coordination of manipulation and visual fixation: a response to Schaffer (1975).
    Ruff HA
    Child Dev; 1976 Sep; 47(3):868-71. PubMed ID: 1001086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual processing schema: a theory of perception.
    Tayal OP
    J Gen Psychol; 1971 Jul; 85(1st Half):3-28. PubMed ID: 5566734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On doing two things at once. II. Elimination of the psychological refractory period effect.
    Greenwald AG; Shulman HG
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Nov; 101(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 4759642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Choice reaction time: the location of auditory and visual similarity.
    Clement DE; Hawkins HL; Hosking KE
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 86(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 4742383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response force as an indicant of conflict in double stimulation.
    Kantowitz BH
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Oct; 100(2):302-9. PubMed ID: 4745460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Study of latent periods of visual object differentiation using various significant characteristics].
    Zaĭtsev AV; Lupandin VI
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2000; 26(4):38-42. PubMed ID: 11004748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Support for lateralization of the Whorf effect beyond the realm of color discrimination.
    Gilbert AL; Regier T; Kay P; Ivry RB
    Brain Lang; 2008 May; 105(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 17628656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Infant recognition of the invariant form of objects.
    Ruff HA
    Child Dev; 1978 Jun; 49(2):293-306. PubMed ID: 679774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of stimulus direction: hemispheric homology and laterality.
    Sekuler R; Pierce S
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Dec; 86(4):679-95. PubMed ID: 4802800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention-getting and attention-holding processes of infant visual preferences.
    Cohen LB
    Child Dev; 1972 Sep; 43(3):869-79. PubMed ID: 5056611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does intermodal equivalence exist between heteromodal stimulus dimensions or between stimulus values on those dimensions?
    Harvey N
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1973 Nov; 25(4):476-91. PubMed ID: 4767531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Young children's orientation of letters as a function of axis of symmetry and stimulus alignment.
    Cairns NU; Steward MS
    Child Dev; 1970 Dec; 41(4):993-1002. PubMed ID: 5496269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recognition thresholds as a function of word length.
    Richards LG; Heller FP
    Am J Psychol; 1976 Sep; 89(3):455-66. PubMed ID: 998810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interhemispheric effects on choice reaction times to one-, two-, and three-letter displays.
    Umiltá C; Frost N; Hyman R
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Apr; 93(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 5013334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Does the perceptual threshold change the dominance between vision and touch].
    Becker-Carus C
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1973; 20(3):347-65. PubMed ID: 4757181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.