These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4744480)

  • 1. Behavioral contrast in pigeons depends upon the operant.
    Hemmes NS
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1973 Oct; 85(1):171-8. PubMed ID: 4744480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of differential reinforcement of low rates (DRL) performance in pigeons (Columba livia) and crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos).
    Powell RW
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1974 Apr; 86(4):736-46. PubMed ID: 4823247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pavlovian and instrumental determinants of response suppression in the pigeon.
    Matthews TJ; McHugh TG; Carr LD
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1974 Sep; 87(3):500-6. PubMed ID: 4415006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Positive behavioral contrast negative simultaneous contrast and their relation to frustration in pigeons.
    Gonzalez RC; Champlin G
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1974 Jul; 87(1):173-87. PubMed ID: 4415133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?
    Nevin JA; Tota ME; Torquato RD; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):359-79. PubMed ID: 2341820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The dynamics of conditioning and extinction.
    Killeen PR; Sanabria F; Dolgov I
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Oct; 35(4):447-72. PubMed ID: 19839699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in operant behavior of pigeons following bilateral forebrain lesions.
    Zeier H
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1968 Aug; 66(1):198-203. PubMed ID: 5672627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Responses eliminated by noncontingent or negatively contingent reinforcement recover in extinction.
    Lindblom LL; Jenkins HM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Apr; 7(2):175-90. PubMed ID: 7241053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oscillations following periodic reinforcement.
    Monteiro T; Machado A
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):170-88. PubMed ID: 18992793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An investigation of peak shift and behavioral contrast for autoshaped and operant behavior.
    Bushnell MC; Weiss SJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Jan; 33(1):101-18. PubMed ID: 7365398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extinction of Pavlovian conditioned inhibition.
    Zimmer-Hart CL; Rescorla RA
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1974 May; 86(5):837-45. PubMed ID: 4833588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vocalizations of White Carneaux pigeons during experiments on schedule-induced aggression.
    Rashotte ME; Katz HN; Griffin RW; Wright AC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Mar; 23(2):285-92. PubMed ID: 1168237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CS-USC presentations and a lever: human autoshaping.
    Wilcove WG; Miller JC
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 Nov; 103(5):868-77. PubMed ID: 4443763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The truly random control procedure: conditioning to the static cues.
    Kremer EF
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1974 Apr; 86(4):700-7. PubMed ID: 4823243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experience with dynamic reinforcement rates decreases resistance to extinction.
    Craig AR; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Mar; 105(2):291-306. PubMed ID: 26813330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence of interaction between deprivation effects and stimulus control.
    Powell RW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Jul; 16(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 5142390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Training reinforcement rates, resistance to extinction, and the role of context in reinstatement.
    Miranda-Dukoski L; Bensemann J; Podlesnik CA
    Learn Behav; 2016 Mar; 44(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 26139290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of US habituation following conditioning.
    Rescorla RA
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1973 Jan; 82(1):137-43. PubMed ID: 4684968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of a single free food presentation on extinction responding in a multiple schedule.
    Reiss AJ; Bell MC
    Behav Processes; 2016 Sep; 130():46-52. PubMed ID: 27423967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Associations in second-order conditioning and sensory preconditioning.
    Rizley RC; Rescorla RA
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1972 Oct; 81(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 4672573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.