These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4744487)

  • 21. Speeded classification in a probabilistic category structure: contrasting exemplar-retrieval, decision-boundary, and prototype models.
    Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Jun; 31(3):608-29. PubMed ID: 15982134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cognitive science and the law.
    Busey TA; Loftus GR
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Mar; 11(3):111-7. PubMed ID: 17270486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The education of perception.
    Goldstone RL; Landy DH; Son JY
    Top Cogn Sci; 2010 Apr; 2(2):265-84. PubMed ID: 25163789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Neural resources associated with perceptual judgment across sensory modalities.
    Yang JN; Szeverenyi NM; Ts'o D
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Jan; 18(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17412720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Precise/not precise (PNP): A Brunswikian model that uses judgment error distributions to identify cognitive processes.
    Sundh J; Collsiöö A; Millroth P; Juslin P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Apr; 28(2):351-373. PubMed ID: 32989718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.
    Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM; Franco R; Trueblood JS
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):193-218. PubMed ID: 21480739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Varieties of cognitive penetration in visual perception.
    Vetter P; Newen A
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Jul; 27():62-75. PubMed ID: 24836978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A dynamic context model of interactive behavior.
    Fu WT
    Cogn Sci; 2011 Jul; 35(5):874-904. PubMed ID: 21736603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability.
    Stanovich KE; West RF
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 94(4):672-95. PubMed ID: 18361678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Information processing models: microscopes of the mind.
    Massaro DW; Cowan N
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1993; 44():383-425. PubMed ID: 8434893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biases and optimality of sensory-motor and cognitive decisions.
    Trommershäuser J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 174():267-78. PubMed ID: 19477345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Time and consistency as measures of psychological distance.
    Snodgrass JG; Kass R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Oct; 35(2):635-45. PubMed ID: 5081295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.
    Lavie N; Hirst A; de Fockert JW; Viding E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):339-54. PubMed ID: 15355143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. What very small numbers mean.
    Cohen DJ; Ferrell JM; Johnson N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Sep; 131(3):424-42. PubMed ID: 12214756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The probability of causal conditionals.
    Over DE; Hadjichristidis C; Evans JS; Handley SJ; Sloman SA
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 Feb; 54(1):62-97. PubMed ID: 16839539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Statistical contingency has a different impact on preparation judgements than on causal judgements.
    De Houwer J; Vandorpe S; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):418-32. PubMed ID: 17366309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Role of event runs in probability learning.
    Gambino B; Myers JL
    Psychol Rev; 1967 Sep; 74(5):410-9. PubMed ID: 6076471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Game relativity: how context influences strategic decision making.
    Vlaev I; Chater N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):131-49. PubMed ID: 16478346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Is there an error of the standard? A critique of Piaget's perceptual theory.
    Begelman DA; Steinfeld GJ
    Genet Psychol Monogr; 1972 Aug; 86(1):81-117. PubMed ID: 5050996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visual probability learning and reversal in the cat.
    Schweikert GE; Treichler FR
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1969 Feb; 67(2):269-72. PubMed ID: 5785616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.