These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
49 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4747134)
1. [Experimental substantiation of the optimal method of scaling the duration of acoustic stimuli]. Medvedev VI; Bagrova ND; Sagal AA Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1973 Jun; 59(6):898-903. PubMed ID: 4747134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Effect of the nature of acoustic relief on the magnitude of the duration effect in patients with peripheral hearing lesions]. Rozenblium AS Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1970; 32(6):72-4. PubMed ID: 5496855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Measurement of the duration of auditory perception]. Gol'dburt SN Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1973 Sep; 59(9):1361-70. PubMed ID: 4789709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [On the perception of faintly audible signals under conditions of uninterrupted attention to stimuli in normal subjects and schizophrenic patients]. Korzh NN Zh Nevropatol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 1967; 67(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 5590320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Measurement of the perceived duration of sound by proportional scaling methods]. Gol'dburt SN; Oginets LV Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1974 Oct; 60(10):1531-9. PubMed ID: 4448214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Capacity of analysis of the auditory receptor in function of time]. Pialoux P; Pimonow L; Lucas A Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1972; 26(1):87-9. PubMed ID: 5086883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Brief acoustic stimuli for the recording of brain stem potentials by computer controlled system analysis]. Kleberc G; Seifert K Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1983 Oct; 62(10):487-92. PubMed ID: 6645752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Relations between sound intensity, latency time and amplitude in the EEG-audiometry]. Kollár A Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1971 Feb; 105(2):49-56. PubMed ID: 5552726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceptual dissimilarities among acoustic stimuli and ipsilateral electric stimuli. McDermott HJ; Sucher CM Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 218(1-2):81-8. PubMed ID: 16777362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Determination of the discriminative threshold of sound intensity with the method of Lüscher and Zwislocki and with the method of constant stimulation. Comparative study of the results]. Grisanti G; Restivo S Valsalva; 1971 Dec; 47(6):277-84. PubMed ID: 5147689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Music to electric ears: pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients. Pressnitzer D; Bestel J; Fraysse B Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Dec; 1060():343-5. PubMed ID: 16597784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sound-induced changes of infraslow brain potential fluctuations in the medial geniculate nucleus and primary auditory cortex in anaesthetized rats. Filippov IV; Williams WC; Krebs AA; Pugachev KS Brain Res; 2007 Feb; 1133(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 17196561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Broadband auditory stream segregation by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. Valentine S; Lentz JJ J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1341-52. PubMed ID: 18664686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]