These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 474850)
1. Policies toward medical technology: the case of electronic fetal monitoring. Banta HD; Thacker SB Am J Public Health; 1979 Sep; 69(9):931-5. PubMed ID: 474850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal monitoring held experimental technique. US Med; 1978 Dec; 14(24):10. PubMed ID: 10308791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Electronic fetal monitoring. Lessons from a formative case of health technology assessment. Banta HD; Thacker SB Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(4):762-70. PubMed ID: 12602077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of diagnostic ultrasound, X-ray examinations, and electronic fetal monitoring in perinatal medicine. Moore RM; Jeng LL; Kaczmarek RG; Placek PJ J Perinatol; 1990 Dec; 10(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 2277282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Historical controversy in health technology assessment: the case of electronic fetal monitoring. Banta DH; Thacker SB Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2001 Nov; 56(11):707-19. PubMed ID: 11711906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implications of the 1976 medical devices legislation. Banta D; Brown S; Behney C Man Med; 1978; 3(2):131-43. PubMed ID: 10316645 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Regulation of medical devices in the U.S.: a disquisition for clinical engineers. Jorgens J J Clin Eng; 1981; 6(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 10251104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The assessment process: a microscopic view. Murphy JR Med Prog Technol; 1991; 17(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 1835753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The medical and legal risks of the electronic fetal monitor. Lent M Stanford Law Rev; 1999 Apr; 51(4):807-37. PubMed ID: 10557629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The limited state of technology assessment for medical devices: facing the issues. Ramsey SD; Luce BR; Deyo R; Franklin G Am J Manag Care; 1998 Sep; 4 Spec No():SP188-99. PubMed ID: 10185994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of diagnostic imaging procedures and fetal monitoring devices in the care of pregnant women. Moore RM; Jeng LL; Kaczmarek RG; Placek PJ Public Health Rep; 1990; 105(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 2120723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical use of medical devices in the 'Bermuda Triangle'. Kessler L; Ramsey SD; Tunis S; Sullivan SD Health Aff (Millwood); 2004; 23(1):200-7. PubMed ID: 15002643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advancing regulatory science to bring novel medical devices for use in emergency care to market: the role of the Food and Drug Administration. Scully CG; Forrest S; Galeotti L; Schwartz SB; Strauss DG Ann Emerg Med; 2015 Apr; 65(4):400-3. PubMed ID: 25128009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On NICHD workshops I (1997) and II (2008) on electronic fetal monitoring. Harvey CJ; Witcher PS J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2009; 38(3):255-7. PubMed ID: 19538611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The financing and regulation of medical devices in the United States. Sisk JE Med Prog Technol; 1982; 9(2-3):181-6. PubMed ID: 7162490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]