These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
49 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4759278)
1. [Influence of inhomogeneity of the useful ray bundle on image quality and dosage]. Drexler G; Nahrstedt U; Widenmann L Rontgenpraxis; 1973 Jul; 26(7):160-7. PubMed ID: 4759278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Checking of the automated collimation system of the X-ray beams in diagnostic equipment]. Voronin KV; Okhrimenko SE Med Tekh; 2004; (6):38-9. PubMed ID: 15656415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The continuous assessment of X-ray tubes and generators. Price R Radiography; 1981 Jan; 47(553):2-15. PubMed ID: 7232700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [X-ray image detectors in stomatology]. Gorelik FG Med Tekh; 1998; (6):17-9. PubMed ID: 9949983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania. Sniureviciute M; Adliene D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography. Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A radiation method of determining the voltage of x-ray radiation generation. Its status and the outlook]. Vladimirov LV; Kozlov AA; Lygin VA; Riabkin AN Med Tekh; 2000; (5):15-9. PubMed ID: 11076358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low dose, high quality possible. Peart O Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(4):371-2. PubMed ID: 18340028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Signal-noise relationship, resolution and dose requirement in the quality comparison of newer intensified films in clinical radiology]. Knedel H; Weberling R; Hagemann G Rontgenpraxis; 1981; 34(4):168-75. PubMed ID: 7233283 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Indication and technic of the 70 mm image intensification in urologic diagnosis]. Seifert J Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1972; ():Suppl:127-8. PubMed ID: 4344518 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Dosage factor for the increase of exposure for x-ray screening rasters]. Stavitskiĭ RV; Iudaev VI Med Tekh; 1982; (4):57-8. PubMed ID: 7132640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Intensifier fluorography and full-size radiography (author's transl)]. Renda F; Sanità Di Toppi G; Di Giandomenico V; Marano P Radiol Med; 1981 Mar; 67(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 7268087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effect of the x-ray tube anode current on the intensity and energy spectrum of the radiation]. Blinov NN; Vasil'ev VN; Gromov GD; Zhutiaev SG; Lebedev LA Med Tekh; 1984; (3):22-5. PubMed ID: 6748895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [It provides a better picture with lower radiation dosage]. Johnson K Vardfacket; 1984 May; 8(10):42-3. PubMed ID: 6568076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Radiation load in the patient and its reduction in fluoroscopy, especially in pediatric radiodiagnosis]. Klein J Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1981 Nov; 75(21):1018-22. PubMed ID: 7340174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]