These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4764496)

  • 1. Effects of varying latencies in the stimulus-response paradigm of speech therapy.
    Irwin RB; Nickles A; Hulit LM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Dec; 37(3):707-13. PubMed ID: 4764496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monitoring and reinforcement by parents as a means of automating articulatory responses.
    Shelton RL; Johnson AF; Arndt WB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Dec; 35(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 4643966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic analysis of the acquisition of acceptable r in American English.
    Klein RP
    Child Dev; 1971 Jun; 42(2):543-50. PubMed ID: 5557226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sound discrimination ability of children with misarticulation of the r-sound.
    Wolfe VI; Irwin RB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Oct; 37(2):415-20. PubMed ID: 4747357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of omissions and substitutions of selected consonants on intelligibility.
    Coston GN; Ainsworth SH
    Br J Disord Commun; 1972 Oct; 7(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 4651975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transfer of training in articulation therapy.
    Mowrer DE
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1971 Nov; 36(4):427-46. PubMed ID: 4942268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech-sound discrimination skills as measured by reaction time for normal and articulatory defective speaking children.
    Weiner FF; Falk ML
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Apr; 34(2):595-600. PubMed ID: 5021811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An automated therapy program for articulatory correction.
    Leonard LB; Webb CE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 5558088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of a timed correct sound production task on carryover.
    Bankson NW; Byrne MC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1972 Mar; 15(1):160-8. PubMed ID: 5012801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of auditory processing before and after treatment in patients with speech disorders.
    Attoni TM; Quintas VG; Lessa AH; Mezzomo CL; Mota HB
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 76(5):672. PubMed ID: 20963356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory assembly of non-prosodic sentences by children.
    Schill MJ; Schuckers GH
    J Commun Disord; 1973 Dec; 6(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 4785184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of response-contingent neutral stimuli on normal speech disfluency.
    Siegel GM; Hanson B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1972 Mar; 15(1):123-33. PubMed ID: 5012796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The imitation of synthetic vowels and some implications for speech memory.
    Kent RD
    Phonetica; 1973; 28(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 4751546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DISCRIMINATION PRETRAINING AND SOUND LEARNING.
    WINITZ H; PREISLER L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Jun; 20():905-16. PubMed ID: 14314014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Studies in speech fluency.
    Siegel GM
    J Commun Disord; 1973 Dec; 6(4):259-71. PubMed ID: 4785181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between auditory discrimination, articulation stimulability, and consistency of misarticulation.
    Lapko LL; Bankson NW
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Feb; 40(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 1118257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship of articulatory defects to speech-sound identification.
    Monnin LM; Huntington DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Sep; 17(3):352-66. PubMed ID: 4424729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A task for evaluation of articulation change. 3. Imitative task scores compared with scores for more spontaneous tasks.
    Wright V; Shelton RL; Arndt WB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1969 Dec; 12(4):875-84. PubMed ID: 5385734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory assembly of segmented sentences by children.
    Schuckers GH; Shriner TH; Daniloff RG
    J Speech Hear Res; 1973 Mar; 16(1):116-27. PubMed ID: 4703829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reinforcement procedures for establishing and maintaining echoic speech by a nonverbal child.
    McReynolds LV
    ASHA Monogr; 1970 Jan; 14():60-6. PubMed ID: 5480651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.