These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 476470)

  • 1. Lexical discrimination and letter-string identification in the two visual fields.
    Bradshaw GJ; Hicks RE; Rose B
    Brain Lang; 1979 Jul; 8(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 476470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Asymmetries in perception of tachistoscopically presented horizontal and vertical random-letter strings.
    Webb RD; Fisher-Ingram L; Hope P
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Oct; 57(2):531-8. PubMed ID: 6634336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age differences in peripheral letter perception.
    Taylor HG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Feb; 8(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 6460076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential effects of concurrent letters on visual field differences in letter recognition.
    Hatta T
    Int J Neurosci; 1982 Sep; 17(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7166476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthographic regularity, lexical status, and letter-identification acuity.
    Hershenson M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Oct; 55(2):635-47. PubMed ID: 7155759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Children's reaction times to verbal and nonverbal tachistoscopic stimuli exposed to the left and right visual hemifields.
    Messina TM; Fogliani AM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Apr; 52(2):459-62. PubMed ID: 7255058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The nature of the task-stimulus interaction in the tachistoscopic recognition of kana and kanji words.
    Sasanuma S; Itoh M; Kobayashi Y; Mori K
    Brain Lang; 1980 Mar; 9(2):298-306. PubMed ID: 7363073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In eliciting hemisphere asymmetries which is more important: the stimulus input side or the recognition side? A tachistoscopic study on normals.
    Berrini R; Della Sala S; Spinnler H; Sterzi R; Vallar G
    Neuropsychologia; 1982; 20(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 7070656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual field sensitivity on a two-choice discrimination task.
    Salmon P; Rodwan A
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Aug; 53(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 7290889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Duration thresholds for letter identification in left and right visual fields for normal and reading-disabled children.
    Gross K; Rothenberg S; Schottenfeld S; Drake C
    Neuropsychologia; 1978; 16(6):709-15. PubMed ID: 748807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Naming and discrimination of Chinese ideograms presented in the right and left visual fields.
    Huang YL; Jones B
    Neuropsychologia; 1980; 18(6):703-6. PubMed ID: 7465031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of sensory limitations on hemispheric processing.
    Sergent J
    Can J Psychol; 1983 Sep; 37(3):345-66. PubMed ID: 6640444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Left visual field superiority in a letter-naming task for both left- and right-handers.
    Bashore TR; Nydegger RV; Miller H
    Cortex; 1982 Jul; 18(2):245-55. PubMed ID: 7128173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A processing division on the recency axis: the selective effects of visual field, match type, and direction of reading on terminal and pre-terminal items in a letter matching task.
    Kirsner K; Dunn JC; Schwartz S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1984 Mar; 55(2):157-78. PubMed ID: 6731003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of visual field, stimulus degradation, and level of practice on event-related potentials of the brain.
    Kok A; van de Vijver FR; Rooijakkers JA
    Psychophysiology; 1985 Nov; 22(6):707-17. PubMed ID: 4089097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus versus face recognition in laterally displayed stimuli.
    Bruyer R; Abdi H; Benoit J
    Am J Psychol; 1987; 100(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 3592025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemispheric functions in the processing of agent-patient information.
    Segalowitz N; Hansson P
    Brain Lang; 1979 Jul; 8(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 476475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of set size on hemifield asymmetries in letter recognition.
    Miller LK; Butler D
    Brain Lang; 1980 Mar; 9(2):307-14. PubMed ID: 7363074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemispheric differences in evoked potentials to verbal and nonverbal stimuli in the left and right visual fields.
    Buchsbaum M; Fedio P
    Physiol Behav; 1970 Feb; 5(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 5525797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bilateral tachistoscopic perception, handedness, and laterality. II. Nonverbal stimuli.
    Schmuller J; Goodman R
    Brain Lang; 1980 Sep; 11(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 7427713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.