These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4767361)

  • 1. Politics and scientific decision making.
    Blissett M
    Conn Med; 1973 Dec; 37(12):625-30. PubMed ID: 4767361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bush favours research at Pentagon and NIH.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2001 Apr; 410(6830):731. PubMed ID: 11298402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Presidential candidates weigh in on health issues.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(20):1494. PubMed ID: 15494595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Science and politics. The background and the issues surrounding the controversial proposal for a National Institute of Nursing.
    Jacox AK
    Nurs Outlook; 1985; 33(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 3845455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Congress slashes "silly titles".
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 May; 357(6376):271. PubMed ID: 1589030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some problems facins biomedical research.
    Longo LD
    Fed Proc; 1973 Nov; 32(11):2078-85. PubMed ID: 4752005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. U.S. science budget. Science agencies caught in postelection spending squeeze.
    Lawler A; Mervis J
    Science; 2004 Dec; 306(5702):1662-3. PubMed ID: 15576575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NIH and the scientist--and a crisis of apathy.
    Waitzman MB
    Fed Proc; 1974 Jun; 33(6):1677-8. PubMed ID: 4827512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system.
    Hegde D; Mowery DC
    Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Election impasse leaves science in the dark.
    Reichhardt T; Smaglik P
    Nature; 2000 Nov; 408(6810):279. PubMed ID: 11099007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. U.S. science policy. GOP takes Senate, budget uncertain.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5597):1313. PubMed ID: 12434024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomedical politics. Sex studies denounced, NIH's peer-review process defended.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2003 Nov; 302(5647):966-7. PubMed ID: 14605337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomedical politics. NIH roiled by inquiries over grants hit list.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5646):758. PubMed ID: 14593135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Glocal" science advocacy.
    Leshner AI
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):877. PubMed ID: 18276853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomedical politics. Sex studies 'properly' approved.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5659):741. PubMed ID: 14764836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gore pledges support for bioscience.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2000 Sep; 407(6801):118. PubMed ID: 11001023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying?
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Feb; 16(2):238. PubMed ID: 18284879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Letter: Peer review system utilized by the NIH and the NSF.
    Fed Proc; 1973 Dec; 32(12):2142-3. PubMed ID: 4753768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Philosophy of science. The coordinates of truth.
    Nabel GJ
    Science; 2009 Oct; 326(5949):53-4. PubMed ID: 19797647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proposals for improving the Peer Review System of the National Institutes of Health.
    Kirschstein RL
    Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 10304717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.