These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4767534)

  • 1. Feature-testing models and their application to perception and memory for speech.
    Smith PT
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1973 Nov; 25(4):511-34. PubMed ID: 4767534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The psychophysics of categorical perception.
    Macmillan NA; Kaplan HL; Creelman CD
    Psychol Rev; 1977 Sep; 84(5):452-71. PubMed ID: 905471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integration of featural information in speech perception.
    Oden GC; Massaro DW
    Psychol Rev; 1978 May; 85(3):172-91. PubMed ID: 663005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Listening to speech at two levels at once.
    Treisman A; Squire R
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1974 Feb; 26(1):82-97. PubMed ID: 4814866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recall of messages presented simultaneously to auditory and visual channels with varying uncertainty and delay of message.
    Newsome LR; Long NR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Feb; 38(1):24. PubMed ID: 4815502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oral kinesthetic sensitivity and the perception of speech.
    Larsen SG; Hudson FG
    Child Dev; 1973 Dec; 44(4):845-8. PubMed ID: 4751306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ear differences in the recall of fricatives and vowels.
    Darwin CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1971 Feb; 23(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 5549664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Memory factors in vowel discrimination of normal and at-risk infants.
    Swoboda PJ; Kass J; Morse PA; Leavitt LA
    Child Dev; 1978 Jun; 49(2):332-9. PubMed ID: 679775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual units in speech recognition.
    Massaro DW
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 Feb; 102(2):199-208. PubMed ID: 4811941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consonant recognition with two levels of decision complexity.
    Holloway CM
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1970 Aug; 22(3):467-74. PubMed ID: 5470326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feature processing in the perception and production of speech.
    Cooper WE; Lauritsen MR
    Nature; 1974 Nov; 252(5479):121-3. PubMed ID: 4425217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiac indices of infant speech perception: orienting and burst discrimination.
    Miller CL; Morse PA; Dorman MF
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1977 Aug; 29(3):533-45. PubMed ID: 905502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification versus discrimination of distinctive features in speech perception.
    Blumstein S; Cooper W
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1972 May; 24(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 5043117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Another approach to evaluating speech sound discrimination.
    Goldman R
    Except Child; 1969 May; 35(9):745-7. PubMed ID: 5786373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactions of cognitive and auditory abilities in congenitally blind individuals.
    Rokem A; Ahissar M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):843-8. PubMed ID: 19138693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neurophysiological basis of discrimination of speech sounds.
    Møller AR
    Audiology; 1978; 17(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 623550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assimilation and contrast in awareness.
    King DL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Feb; 86(1):78. PubMed ID: 9530712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual categories for musiclike sounds: implications for theories of speech perception.
    Cutting JE; Rosner BS; Foard CF
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1976 Aug; 28(3):361-78. PubMed ID: 1005649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Manipulations of irrelevant information: suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech.
    Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC; Neath I
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 10881609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual independence in the perception of speech.
    Corcoran DW; Dorfman DD; Weening DL
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1968 Nov; 20(4):336-50. PubMed ID: 5720570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.