These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4772788)

  • 1. Anchor effects in category judgment of weight.
    Vuorinen R
    Scand J Psychol; 1973; 14(4):261-72. PubMed ID: 4772788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the role of context effects in psychophysical judgment.
    Anderson NH
    Psychol Rev; 1975 Nov; 82(6):462-82. PubMed ID: 1187911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adaptation-level and theory of signal detection: an examination and integration of two judgment models for voluntary stimulus generalization.
    Hébert JA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1973 Mar; 37(1):15-29. PubMed ID: 4697158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conjoint scaling of subjective number and weight.
    Rule SJ; Curtis DW
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Mar; 97(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 4705240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensory and decision processes in anchor effects and aftereffects.
    McNicol D; Pennington CW
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Oct; 100(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 4745454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of field-dependency on weight comparisons.
    Blasi ER; Cross HA; Hebert JA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Aug; 35(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 5054024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Apparent weight differences as a source of after-effects.
    Kolehmainen K; Mikkonen VV
    Scand J Psychol; 1970; 11(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 5525911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tests of the psychological meaning of the power law.
    Duda PD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 May; 104(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 1194869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptation-level theory and context effects on sensory judgments: perception for response?
    Ellis HD
    Perception; 1972; 1(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 4680921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Judgments of similarities and differences in psychophysical experiments as a consequence of perceptual dominance].
    Schüle W
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1979; 26(2):315-33. PubMed ID: 483894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Avector model for psychophysical judgment.
    Ross J; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol; 1968 Jul; 77(3):Suppl 1:1-16. PubMed ID: 5666498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comment on internal feedback as a theory of judgment: a reply to Levin.
    Veit CT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1978 Mar; 107(1):112-4. PubMed ID: 624916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Channel capacity in the magnitude estimation of weight.
    Fulgosi A; Bezinović P; Mimica I; Taksić V
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Oct; 42(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 3684488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An experimental test of two mathematical models applied to the size-weight illusion.
    Sarris V; Heineken E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 May; 2(2):295-8. PubMed ID: 1271034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ratio and subtractive processes in psychophysical judgment.
    Veit CT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1978 Mar; 107(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 624918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of intervals and magnitudes for three prothetic continua.
    Marks LE; Cain WS
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Jun; 94(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 5032215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Catastrophe theory and brightness judgments.
    Ayres TJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1981 Apr; 29(4):407. PubMed ID: 7279566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methodological study of conservation in retarded adolescents.
    Carlson JS; Michalson LH
    Am J Ment Defic; 1973 Nov; 78(3):348-53. PubMed ID: 4769178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of memory time on successive judgments.
    Tate JD; Springer RM
    Psychol Bull; 1971 Dec; 76(6):394-408. PubMed ID: 5147389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A model for partitioning judgment error in psychophysics.
    Eyman RK; Kim PJ
    Psychol Bull; 1970 Jul; 74(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 5425185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.