107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 477310)
1. After Quinlan: the impact of the Saikewicz decision.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1979 Jul; 43(7):455. PubMed ID: 477310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The incompetent's right to die: the case of Joseph Saikewicz.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Feb; 8(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 624618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent.
Annas GJ
Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The lessons of Quinlan.
Drane JF
Health Prog; 1986; 67(6):19-23. PubMed ID: 10277355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Quinlan decision.
Lyons C
Christ Crisis; 1976 May; 36(8):103-4. PubMed ID: 11661438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical paternalism or legal imperialism: not the only alternatives for handling Saikewicz-type cases.
Buchanan A
Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 507063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Decisions not to treat: the Saikewicz case and its aftermath.
Glantz LH; Swazey JP
Bull Am Coll Physicians; 1979 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 11661768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology.
Hyland WF; Baime DS
Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The case of Joseph Saikewicz.
Annas GJ
New Physician; 1979 Mar; 28(3):45-46+. PubMed ID: 11664987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Virginia Natural Death Act--a critical analysis.
Murphy JG
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1983; 17(4):863-79. PubMed ID: 11649800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan.
Bennett SA
Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assuring "detached but passionate investigation and decision": the role of guardians ad litem in Saikewicz-type cases.
Baron CH
Am J Law Med; 1978; 4(2):111-30. PubMed ID: 707492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. "Pulling the plug": are you ready to make the decision?
Ginsburg WH
Physicians Manage; 1985 Mar; 25(3):349-51, 354, 357-60 passim. PubMed ID: 10270469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Quinlan decision: five commentaries. Beyond an ethic of immediate sympathy.
Oden TC
Hastings Cent Rep; 1976 Feb; 6(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 1254450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Quinlan decision: five commentaries. Obscuring the role of the physician.
Branson R; Casebeer K
Hastings Cent Rep; 1976 Feb; 6(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 1254463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Searching for proper judicial recognition of hospital ethics committees in decisions to forego medical treatment.
Murphy CA
Gold Gate Law Rev; 1990; 20(2):319-44. PubMed ID: 11651055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Quinlan decision: five commentaries. Prolonged dying: not medically indicated.
Ramsey P
Hastings Cent Rep; 1976 Feb; 6(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 1254451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. After Saikewicz: No-fault death.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Jun; 8(3):16-8. PubMed ID: 669930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Natural death: an alternative in New Jersey.
Levant S
Georgetown Law J; 1985 Jun; 73(5):1331-54. PubMed ID: 11651811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Guidelines for health care. Facilities in the care of comatose patients. Declaration by state agencies of endorsement of guidelines for implementation of Quinlan decision.
J Med Soc N J; 1977 Apr; 74(4):368-71. PubMed ID: 265414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
