These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 477310)
41. Law at the edge of life: issues of death and dying. Janzen PS Hamline Law Rev; 1984 Jun; 7(2):431-62. PubMed ID: 11649814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The Saikewicz case sparks interest in living will. Euthanasia News; 1978; 4(2):5-6. PubMed ID: 11664926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die. Glick HR West Polit Q; 1992; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Nat Hentoff on the babies Doe. McFadden JP; Hentoff N Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):73-104. PubMed ID: 11651744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. A critique of Louisiana's approach to withholding medical treatment from defective newborns. Goichman G South Univ Law Rev; 1983; 9(2):157-84. PubMed ID: 11652508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. From Quinlan to Jobes: the courts and the PVS patient. Armstrong PW; Colen BD Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 3350650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Warthen v. Toms River Community Memorial Hospital. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1986 May; 1(6):479-82. PubMed ID: 11644049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Mediating life and death decisions. Hoffmann DE Ariz Law Rev; 1994; 36(4):821-77. PubMed ID: 11656438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey. Sarno JJ Seton Hall Legis J; 1987; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Power of court to order or authorize discontinuation of extraordinary medical means of sustaining human life. Karnezis KC Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1977; 79():237-47. PubMed ID: 12085877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. The Metropolitan New York Ethics Committee Network: coming together at a time of concern. Zuckerman C Fordham Int Law J; 1993 Mar; 5(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 11651585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. In re Conroy: forging a path to death with dignity. Agrawal A Boston Univ Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 67(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 11649960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Saikewica and Dinnerstein: the decisions. Cushing M Mass Nurse; 1979 Apr; 48(4):19-20. PubMed ID: 253883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Responses to "From ethical dilemma to hospital policy. Bader D; Miles J Health Prog; 1991 Nov; 72(9):27-30. PubMed ID: 11645705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. In the matter of Mary Hier. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar; 1(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 11644048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The Right to Die: Public Health Trust v. Wons -- Florida moves away from Massachusetts and New Jersey toward California and Mississippi despite Cruzan v. Harmon. Gordon DR N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1990; 7(2):40-98. PubMed ID: 11652593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. In re D.H. Di Somma AV Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(3):403. PubMed ID: 11644339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Life-support withdrawal: law of commiseration or principle? Byrnes JC Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):331-54. PubMed ID: 11651213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]