71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4774187)
21. Endocervical cells on Pap smears.
Hawkins R
J Fam Pract; 1996 Aug; 43(2):114. PubMed ID: 8708612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Recommended code of practice for laboratories providing a cytopathology service.
Dunn PJ
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):138. PubMed ID: 9577742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Progress report on the Bethesda System].
Cochand-Priollet B; Ziol M; ; Cartier I; Dubois A; Michiels-Marzais D; Müller J; Picot R; Tartar MD; Vacher-Lavenu MC; Vincent S
Ann Pathol; 2006 Oct; 26(5):382-8. PubMed ID: 17255927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Cytological screening--the technique of cytological specimen taking and its influence on the quality of the method].
Ivanov S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 18642552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Variables involved in rapid review.
O'Sullivan JP; Chapman PA; Jenkins L; Smith R
Cytopathology; 1999 Apr; 10(2):144-5. PubMed ID: 10211623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Automated screening for quality control using PAPNET: a study of 638 negative Pap smears.
Keyhani-Rofagha S; Palma T; O'Toole RV
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 8725131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The danger of only using a Pap smear.
Vazquez E
Posit Aware; 1999; 10(3):23. PubMed ID: 11366762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. By the way, doctor. I'm 48 years old, and 26 years ago I had a cone biopsy after an abnormal Pap test. Since then, all my Pap tests have been normal. But for the past three years, scar tissue has made it difficult for my gynecologist to get adequate cells. What do I do about Pap smears now?
Robb-Nicholson C
Harv Womens Health Watch; 2006 Aug; 13(12):8. PubMed ID: 17117509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Tests may replace Pap smears.
AIDS Patient Care STDS; 2000 May; 14(5):286. PubMed ID: 10833822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Weekly rescreening of 10% of the total cervical Papanicolaou smears: a worthwhile quality assurance scheme.
Sampatanukul P; Wannakrairot P; Promprakob U; Yodavudh S; Anansiriprapa C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Sep; 87 Suppl 2():S261-5. PubMed ID: 16083199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Do you still need an annual Pap?
Johns Hopkins Med Lett Health After 50; 2003 Sep; 15(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 14533590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [How to read a PAP report?].
Nieminen P
Duodecim; 1998; 114(11):1138-43. PubMed ID: 11544696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Consistency of reporting endocervical cells. An intralaboratory and interlaboratory assessment.
Mitchell H
Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(3):310-4. PubMed ID: 8191817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Pap smears collected by nurse practitioners: a comparison with smears collected by medical practitioners.
Mitchell H
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1993 Jun; 20(5):807-10. PubMed ID: 8337173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pap test update. New guidelines reflect new evidence.
Mayo Clin Womens Healthsource; 2003 May; 7(5):1-2. PubMed ID: 12714935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Pap, Bethesda or something else?].
Syrjänen K
Duodecim; 2000; 116(11):1248-50. PubMed ID: 11989011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Rescreening of Pap smears.
Maughan KL
J Fam Pract; 1998 Apr; 46(4):279-80. PubMed ID: 9564365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Experience with fifteen thousand consecutive Pap smears.
Sandmire HF
Wis Med J; 1972 Apr; 71(4):130-3. PubMed ID: 5030521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Is Bethesda system better than Pap classification?].
Vuopala S
Duodecim; 1999; 115(18):2030-4. PubMed ID: 11941821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of specimen adequacy reproducibility: an Italian experience.
Montanari G; Confortini M; Bellomi A; Cocchi V; Dalla Palma P; D'Ambrosio E; Giovagnoli MR; Navone R; Ronco G;
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):224-6. PubMed ID: 12672101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
