These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4774377)

  • 1. Temporal changes in electrode impedance while recording the electrocardiogram with "dry" electrodes.
    Geddes LA; Valentinuzzi ME
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1973 Mar; 1(3):356-67. PubMed ID: 4774377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A monolithic electrode amplifier.
    Greenstein E; Hynecek J
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1971; 8():77-80. PubMed ID: 5146942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time and frequency dependence of disposable ECG electrode-skin impedance.
    Olson WH; Schmincke DR; Henley BL
    Med Instrum; 1979; 13(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 502923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Insulated electrocardiogram electrodes.
    David RM; Portnoy WM
    Med Biol Eng; 1972 Nov; 10(6):742-51. PubMed ID: 4344175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-fidelity electrode/preamplifier for cardiography.
    Silcocks HL; Higley WR; Waggoner JA
    J Assoc Adv Med Instrum; 1971; 5(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 5155372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determining the input impedance of ECG amplifiers using accurate electrode modelling.
    Maji S; Burke MJ
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Jan; 6(1):015030. PubMed ID: 33438618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amplifier input impedance in dry electrode ECG recording.
    Assambo C; Burke MJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():1774-7. PubMed ID: 19964015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time based measurement of the impedance of the skin-electrode interface for dry electrode ECG recording.
    Dozio R; Baba A; Assambo C; Burke MJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():5001-4. PubMed ID: 18003129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-electrode-pair electrocardiogram with no common ground between two pairs.
    Hsieh HY; Luo CH; Ye JW; Tai CC
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2019 Nov; 90(11):114703. PubMed ID: 31779454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An operational amplifier 4-electrode impedance bridge for electrolyte measurements.
    Ferris CD; Rose DR
    Med Biol Eng; 1972 Sep; 10(5):647-54. PubMed ID: 5076429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Movement artefact suppressor during ECG monitoring.
    Klijn JA; Kloprogge MJ
    Cardiovasc Res; 1974 Jan; 8(1):149-52. PubMed ID: 4819484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simple two-electrode biosignal amplifier.
    Dobrev D; Neycheva T; Mudrov N
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2005 Nov; 43(6):725-30. PubMed ID: 16594298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of electrode impedance in improved buffer amplifier for bioelectric recordings.
    Valverde ER; Arini PD; Bertran GC; Biagetti MO; Quinteiro RA
    J Med Eng Technol; 2004; 28(5):217-22. PubMed ID: 15371001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An easily applied and removed dry annular suction electrode.
    Geddes LA; Moore AG; Baker R; Mack R
    J Electrocardiol; 1976 Apr; 9(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 1262774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An active probe for electrocardiography.
    Tiberghien J; Cornelis J; Taeymans J; Steenhaut O; Kornreich F
    Biomed Eng; 1976 Jul; 11(7):249-50. PubMed ID: 953119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radio-frequency heating under ECG electrodes.
    DeRosa JF; Gadsby PD
    Med Instrum; 1979; 13(5):273-6. PubMed ID: 502924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of gel-to-gel and skin measurements of electrode impedance.
    Klingler DR; Schoenberg AA; Worth NP; Egleston CF; Burkart JA
    Med Instrum; 1979; 13(5):266-8. PubMed ID: 502922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 50Hz interference and noise in ECG recordings--a review.
    Wan SW; Nguyen HT
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1994 Sep; 17(3):108-15. PubMed ID: 7980199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Active Electrodes for Wearable EEG Acquisition: Review and Electronics Design Methodology.
    Xu J; Mitra S; Van Hoof C; Yazicioglu RF; Makinwa KAA
    IEEE Rev Biomed Eng; 2017; 10():187-198. PubMed ID: 28113349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhancing interference rejection of preamplified electrodes by automated gain adaption.
    Degen T; Jäckel H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Nov; 51(11):2031-9. PubMed ID: 15536905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.