These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4779714)

  • 1. Personality and styles of hypnotic response.
    Field PB
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1973 Apr; 15(4):234-8. PubMed ID: 4779714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hypnotizability and "cognitive styles": a search for relationships.
    Morgan AH
    J Pers; 1972 Dec; 40(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 4642388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hypnotizability and cognitive controls.
    Goldberger NI; Wachtel PL
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1973 Oct; 21(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 4746259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Articulateness of the field and cognitive styles.
    Gupta GC
    J Gen Psychol; 1974 Jul; 91(1st Half):3-8. PubMed ID: 4418769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Field independence-dependence and Electrosone 50 induced altered states of consciousness.
    Krippner S; Brown DP
    J Clin Psychol; 1973 Jul; 29(3):316-9. PubMed ID: 4726679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Personality factors of the Cattell "16 PF Test" and hypnotic susceptibility.
    Hartman BJ
    Psychol Rep; 1966 Dec; 19(3):1337-8. PubMed ID: 5956435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Hypnotic Induction Profile and hypnotic susceptibility.
    Eliseo TS
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1974 Oct; 22(4):320-6. PubMed ID: 4416589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Some personality correlates of hypnotic susceptibility.
    Pedersen DM; Cooper LM
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1965 Jul; 13(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 5877355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring hypnotic responsiveness: a comparison of the Barber Suggestibility Scale and the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form A.
    Ruch JC; Morgan AH; Hilgard ER
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1974 Oct; 22(4):365-76. PubMed ID: 4414606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dimensions of activity and passivity in hypnosis and hypnotic susceptibility.
    Svobda M
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1971 Jul; 14(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 5163564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lateral eye movements, hypnotic susceptibility and field independence-dependence.
    DeWitt GW; Averill JR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Dec; 43(3 Pt 2):1179-84. PubMed ID: 1012895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Field-independence and self-actualization.
    Doyle JA
    Psychol Rep; 1975 Apr; 36(2):363-6. PubMed ID: 1144580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eye-roll and hypnotic susceptibility.
    Wheeler L; Reis HT; Wolff E; Grupsmith E; Mordkoff AM
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1974 Oct; 22(4):327-34. PubMed ID: 4413406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive styles in children and performance on Piagetian conservation tasks.
    Fleck JR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Dec; 35(3):747-56. PubMed ID: 4643964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ratings of "trust" and hypnotic susceptibilty.
    Roberts AH; Tellegen A
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1973 Oct; 21(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 4746258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measures of psychological differentiation: Rod-and-frame Test and the Psychological Differentiation Inventory.
    Gaines LS; Miller LM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Aug; 37(1):146. PubMed ID: 4727988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of experimentally induced expectations on responses to the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.
    Saavedra RL; Miller RJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1983 Jan; 31(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 6822445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A note on the failure to find personality differences between volunteers and nonvolunteers for hypnotic research.
    Cooper LM; Pedersen DM
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1965 Oct; 13(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 5877360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of two observers scoring the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C.
    Evans FJ; Schmeidler D
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1964 Oct; 12(4):239-51. PubMed ID: 5872264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Field dependence and the Eysenck personality inventory: a replication.
    Hughes RN; Hall CJ; Chambers RL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Dec; 47(3 Pt 2):1132. PubMed ID: 745885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.