These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 478749)

  • 21. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
    Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of education level on design-induced N170 and P300 components of event related potentials in the human brain.
    Begum T; Reza F; Ahmed I; Abdullah JM
    J Integr Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 13(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 24738540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hemispheric asymmetry in transient visual evoked potentials induced by the spatial factor of the stimulation.
    Rebai M; Bagot JD; Viggiano MP
    Brain Cogn; 1993 Nov; 23(2):263-78. PubMed ID: 8292329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Generators of visual evoked potentials investigated by dipole tracing in the human occipital cortex.
    Ikeda H; Nishijo H; Miyamoto K; Tamura R; Endo S; Ono T
    Neuroscience; 1998 Jun; 84(3):723-39. PubMed ID: 9579779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Spatial frequency-dependent asymmetry of visual evoked potential amplitudes.
    van Orden KF; House JF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Jun; 82(3 Pt 1):1011-8. PubMed ID: 8774045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatial distribution of attention and inter-hemispheric competition.
    Yamaoka K; Michimata C
    Cogn Process; 2015 Nov; 16(4):417-25. PubMed ID: 26289477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detection of cerebral lateralization of function using EEG alpha-contingent visual stimulation.
    Goodman DM; Beatty J; Mulholland TB
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Apr; 48(4):418-31. PubMed ID: 6153603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Target detection in one visual field in the presence or absence of stimuli in the contralateral field by right- and left-handed subjects.
    Yund EW; Efron R; Nichols DR
    Brain Cogn; 1990 Jan; 12(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 2297429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hemispheric differences in evoked potentials to verbal and nonverbal stimuli in the left and right visual fields.
    Buchsbaum M; Fedio P
    Physiol Behav; 1970 Feb; 5(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 5525797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Left dominance for language perception starts in the extrastriate cortex: An ERP and sLORETA study.
    Selpien H; Siebert C; Genc E; Beste C; Faustmann PM; Güntürkün O; Ocklenburg S
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Sep; 291():325-333. PubMed ID: 26048428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Memory-driven processing in human medial occipital cortex: an event-related optical signal (EROS) study.
    Gratton G; Fabiani M; Goodman-Wood MR; Desoto MC
    Psychophysiology; 1998 May; 35(3):348-51. PubMed ID: 9564756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceptual interference and hemispheric specialization.
    Hines D; Glista J; Byers B
    Brain Cogn; 1985 Jan; 4(1):76-89. PubMed ID: 4027057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. On spatial frequencies and cerebral hemispheres: some remarks from the electrophysiological and neuropsychological points of view.
    Mecacci L
    Brain Cogn; 1993 Jul; 22(2):199-212. PubMed ID: 8373573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Role of interstimulus and stimulus-hemisphere compatibility in the process of interhemispheric integration.
    Berger JM; Perret E; Zimmermann A
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Oct; 67(2):503-12. PubMed ID: 3217198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reduced interhemispheric transmission in schizophrenia patients: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Endrass T; Mohr B; Rockstroh B
    Neurosci Lett; 2002 Mar; 320(1-2):57-60. PubMed ID: 11849763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of adaptation to the stimulating pattern on the latency and wave form of visual evoked potentials.
    Ochs AL; Aminoff MJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 May; 48(5):502-8. PubMed ID: 6153958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contributions of stimulus encoding and memory search to right hemisphere superiority in face recognition: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.
    Schweinberger SR; Sommer W
    Neuropsychologia; 1991; 29(5):389-413. PubMed ID: 1886682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of concurrent verbal memory on recognition of stimuli from the left and right visual fields.
    Hellige JB; Cox PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 May; 2(2):210-21. PubMed ID: 1271028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The contribution of attention to the right visual field advantage for word recognition.
    Nicholls ME; Wood AG
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Dec; 38(3):339-57. PubMed ID: 9841790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Binocular summation and suppression: visually evoked cortical responses to dichoptically presented patterns of different spatial frequencies.
    Harter MR; Seiple WH; Musso M
    Vision Res; 1974 Nov; 14(11):1169-80. PubMed ID: 4428623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.