These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 478836)
1. Declaration of Helsinki should be strengthened. Rothman KJ BMJ; 2000 Aug; 321(7258):442-5. PubMed ID: 10938059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Editors' Overview: Experiments, Ethics, and New Technologies. Doorn N; Spruit S; Robaey Z Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Jun; 22(3):607-11. PubMed ID: 26745994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Letter: Ethics of human experimentation. N Engl J Med; 1975 Feb; 292(6):320-1. PubMed ID: 1110719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethics and research beyond western society. Watkins P Clin Med (Lond); 2001; 1(3):166. PubMed ID: 11446604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Fetus as a Research Subject. Ibuki T; Yamamoto K; Matsui K Am J Bioeth; 2022 Mar; 22(3):76-78. PubMed ID: 35258432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of nursing members in research ethics committees in Japan. Sakaida Y; Ota K; Sone C Nagoya J Med Sci; 2022 Nov; 84(4):813-824. PubMed ID: 36544601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Willingness to participate in various nontherapeutic cancer research activities among urban and rural African American and Latinx healthy volunteers. Scarinci IC; Hansen B; Green BL; Sodeke SO; Price-Haywood EG; Kim YI Cancer Causes Control; 2022 Aug; 33(8):1059-1069. PubMed ID: 35404020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Taking the principle of the primacy of the human being seriously. Różyńska J Med Health Care Philos; 2021 Dec; 24(4):547-562. PubMed ID: 34318429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Written versus verbal consent: a qualitative study of stakeholder views of consent procedures used at the time of recruitment into a peripartum trial conducted in an emergency setting. Lawton J; Hallowell N; Snowdon C; Norman JE; Carruthers K; Denison FC BMC Med Ethics; 2017 May; 18(1):36. PubMed ID: 28539111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should all research subjects be treated the same? Brody B; Migueles SA; Wendler D Hastings Cent Rep; 2015; 45(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 25600384 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Learning the right lessons from the SUPPORT study controversy. Lantos JD Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2014 Jan; 99(1):F4-5. PubMed ID: 23970799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The historical foundations of the research-practice distinction in bioethics. Beauchamp TL; Saghai Y Theor Med Bioeth; 2012 Feb; 33(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 22258893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The myth of equipoise in phase 1 clinical trials. Shamoo AE Medscape J Med; 2008; 10(11):254. PubMed ID: 19099004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety in human research: past problems and current challenges from a Canadian perspective. Schwartz B HEC Forum; 2008 Sep; 20(3):277-90. PubMed ID: 18803018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient attitudes following participation in a health outcome survey. Funch DP; Marshall JR Am J Public Health; 1981 Dec; 71(12):1396-8. PubMed ID: 7316006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clarifying the concepts of research ethics. Levine RJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1979 Jun; 9(3):21-6. PubMed ID: 478836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Research involving children: Recommendations of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Jonsen AR Pediatrics; 1978 Aug; 62(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 693150 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethical guidelines for biomedical research. Blomquist C Ann Clin Res; 1975 Oct; 7(5):291-4. PubMed ID: 1211845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]