192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4793181)
1. [Occupational deafness. Medical criteria of selection for work in environmental noise].
Teodorescu L; Stratulat E; Cornea I
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 1973; 77(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 4793181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Occupational noise: measure it, then do something about it.
Glorig A
Int J Occup Health Saf; 1974; 43(2):24-7. PubMed ID: 4430542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Noise induced deafness in industrial medicine].
Klosterkötter W
Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1972 Apr; 51(4):203-14. PubMed ID: 5037274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Basic criteria for vegetative reaction and deafness conditioned by noise].
Janssen G
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1971; 25(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 5120986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Preventing hearing loss due to excessive noise exposure.
Sataloff J
J Occup Med; 1974 Jul; 16(7):470-1. PubMed ID: 4842003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Environmental noise].
Merluzzi F
Med Lav; 1973; 64(3):115-20. PubMed ID: 4769887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [The prevention of noise: a medico-social problem of today].
Terzuolo D
Minerva Med; 1970 Aug; 61(61):3332-6. PubMed ID: 5433237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Program of hearing preservation in the metallurgy plant in Huachipato].
Benavides R
Rev Med Chil; 1973 Aug; 101(8):661-5. PubMed ID: 4775618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Medical prevention of occupational deafness caused by noise (audiomobile program SUVA)].
Probst R
Soz Praventivmed; 1975; 20(5):210-1. PubMed ID: 1217184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Occupational hearing loss.
Sataloff J
J Occup Med; 1973 Apr; 15(4):360-3. PubMed ID: 4695062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Noise levels in industry].
Morin J
Arch Mal Prof; 1967 Jun; 28(6):517-22. PubMed ID: 5618393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Needed: a balanced approach to hearing protection.
Strassburg RW
Occup Health Saf; 1976; 45(4):42-3, 45-7. PubMed ID: 181710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Protective devices in a hearing conservation program. The rationale and justification of personal hearing protectors.
Gosztonyi RE
J Occup Med; 1975 Nov; 17(11):731-3. PubMed ID: 1195035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How a management commitment works at Coors.
Babb A
Occup Health Saf; 1976; 45(4):48-9, 51. PubMed ID: 181711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Exposure to noise in the textile industry of the U.A.R.
Noweir MH; el-Dakhakhny AA; Valic F
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1968; 29(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 5703674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Are hearing tests necessary during continued work in a noisy environment?].
Schwetz F
Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1972; 106(7):344-52. PubMed ID: 5083621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Are hearing tests necessary during continued work in a noisy environment?].
Schwetz F
Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1972; 106(7):344-52. PubMed ID: 4638572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A test for susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss.
Smith PE
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1969; 30(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 5793993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Problems raised by prevention of occupational deafness in industrial environments: proposed solutions].
Pepersack JP
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1971; 25(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 5120991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The behaviour of the pathological ear in noise.
Chadwick DL
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1971; 25(1):113-28. PubMed ID: 5120975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
